Andrew Jackson was a strict constructionist. This means that he had a strict interpretation of the United States Constitution, as opposed to a loose constructionist who had a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution. He believed that it should not be up for interpretation and should be interpreted how it is stated.
The Bank of the United States was quite a controversial topic during this time, as strict constructionists thought it was against the United States Constitution since there was nowhere in it that stated the bank could be created. On the other hand, loose constructionists did not think having a bank was unconstitutional because it was "<em>necessary and proper</em>." They would continue to use this Necessary and Proper Clause or the "<em>elastic clause</em>" to push for things that were not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
Answer:
B - Set to their village and ambush Spaniards that wonder away from their camp
Explanation:
By simulating a retreat, they lured the Spaniards out of their fortifications, and then, with the help of cunning, combined with incredible courage, they were able to gradually reduce the number of enemies. Unlike the eastern tribes, the Plains Indians rarely attacked settlements or forts of white people. Even if there were only a few dozen people inside and, according to Europeans, the settlement was poorly fortified, the Indians were well aware of the losses that could have been incurred as a result of a frontal attack, and avoided this. In the best case, they tried to lure some of the people out of the fortifications and trap them or get inside under a peaceful pretext, and only then attack.
Answer:
Explanation:
Europeans introduced such domestic animals as cattle, pigs, chickens, goats, and sheep to North America, with the intent of using the animal meat for food, and hides or wool for clothing. They also inadvertently brought pest animals and plants, such as rats and assorted weeds.
i hope this helps :)