The correct answer is b. passing ex post facto laws.
Ex post facto laws are those that retroactively change the rules of evidence in a criminal case and increase the punishment of a crime that was legal when committed. This is a violation of Article 1 Section 10 clause 1 of the constitution
Answer:
In literary and historical analysis, presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter.[1] The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.
Yes, it would never hurt for a country to be more powerful and stronger /more protected
Answer: A job opportunities
Explanation: I hope this helps =)
