1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naya [18.7K]
3 years ago
7

Why do scientists think that the Voynich Manuscript has six chapters or sections?

History
1 answer:
Liono4ka [1.6K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Although the Voynich Manuscript is not divided into chapters or even sections, scholars believe the book is divided into six parts: herbal, astronomical, biological, cosmological, pharmaceutical and prescriptions. The manuscript may be of a magical or scientific nature.

Explanation:

Illustrations are conventionally used to divide most manuscripts into six different sections because the text itself cannot be read and no one has ever been able to read it, and the illustrations present six different topics, and so the book is thought to be divided into 6 chapters: <em>botany, astronomical charts, naked female figures in tubs, cosmos, use of plants, and unexplored text that it cosidered to represent food recipes.</em>

You might be interested in
Identify the province of Judea
Talja [164]
Photo attached with answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
June 28 has a fairly significant meaning, for both Franz Ferdinand and the
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

1914 Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria and his wife Sophie are assassinated in Sarajevo by young Serb nationalist Gavrilo Princip at 10:45, the casus belli of WWI

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Thirty Years’ War in Central Europe began when
Fofino [41]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

romans wanted control of the catolics

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What reformer outlined the social gospel in the book entitled christianity and the social crisis?
BlackZzzverrR [31]
It was Walter Rauschenbusch.
4 0
3 years ago
HELP!!! Why is selective incorporation important?
Sholpan [36]

So big picture, selective incorporation, it's the doctrine where judicial decisions incorporate rights from the Bill of Rights to limit laws from states that are perceived to infringe on those rights, and the justification comes from the 14th Amendment.  It refers to the legal doctrine the U. S. Supreme Court has employed over the years to extend the rights guaranteed by the U. S. Constitution to the states. Through selective incorporation, the Court has ruled that states may not pass laws restricting many of the important rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Selective incorporation is a doctrine written into the Constitution that protects American citizens from their states' enacting of laws that could infringe upon their rights. Selective incorporation is not a law, but a doctrine that has been established and confirmed time and again by the United States Supreme Court.

The idea of selective incorporation dates to when the Constitution was being drafted, with the founding fathers heatedly debating the power of state governments versus the power of the federal government. In the end, the Constitution was signed and enacted without any definitive conclusion on the issue. In the 1833 case of Barron v. Baltimore, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government, meaning that states were able to pass their own laws violating the Bill of Rights without any intervention by the federal government.  It wasn't until 1868 that Congress passed the 14th Amendment, forbidding states from denying anyone the freedom to life, liberty, and property without due process, thus reversing the decision of Barron v. Baltimore.  Beginning in the 1920s, the Supreme Court ruled on many cases about the protection of the Bill of Rights within state laws. Selective incorporation is based on this approach to choosing which clauses of the Bill of Rights apply to state governments.  As the Supreme Court continued to rule on cases challenging state governments' ability to violate the Bill of Rights, justices began to debate the application of the 14th Amendment. Some felt that the amendment applied to the all amendments in the Bill of Rights, prohibiting states from the same violations as the federal government, while others felt that only portions of those basic rights should be incorporated. In the 1937 case of Palko v. Connecticut, the Court rejected total incorporation and adopted the doctrine of selective incorporation as well as the guidelines for applying it.

HOPE THIS HELPS :)

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Bill and Rita Smith’s house bombed
    7·1 answer
  • Article VIl of the Constitution describes:
    9·2 answers
  • The voyages of Zheng he development of blue and white porcelain and the establishment of the forbidden city are all associated w
    14·1 answer
  • What right for prisoners did the case of younger v. gilmore establish?
    8·1 answer
  • Besides restoring water, what is the most important job of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan?
    13·2 answers
  • What acts by Congress were intended to prevent this repressive social and political order?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the weather like during the Civil War?
    13·1 answer
  • . Tobacco was used for ritual purposes by indigenous peoples in the Americas, but
    10·2 answers
  • WHAT POLITICAL ROLE DID THE WOMEN PLAY IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOUTH AFRICA FORM THE 1970s TO THE 1990S essay.​
    13·1 answer
  • Big Bend National Park and Guadalupe Peak are found in which region?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!