Alternative evaluation is what Marketers
characteristic the way the consumer make information to arrive at brand choices
as alternative evaluation. After buying
a product, the consumer will be satisfied or dissatisfied and will engage in post
purchase behaviour. The relationship between the consumer's expectations and
the product's perceived performance determines whether the buyer is satisfied
or dissatisfied with a purchase.
Okay so rewards and penalties make people make better decisions. So like if I don't get questions wrong on a test I receive $5 from my parents, but if I fail a test I'm grounded for a week. So I study more to get money. (this is not actually me just making an example). Rewards make people want to do better, and so do penalties. I don't want to do bad and get punished for it.
Answer:
option (b) 20
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Net fixed assets = $400,000
Short-term liabilities = $30,000
Long-term liabilities = $20,000
Common stockholders' equity = $90,000
Total stockholders' equity = $100,000
Now,
Ratio of fixed assets to long term liabilities
= Net Fixed assets ÷ Long term liabilities
or
= $400,000 ÷ $20,000
= 20
Hence,
The correct answer is option (b) 20
Answer: It just would not be a cross walk it would be a road.
Explanation:
Answer:
Red Cross took the right decision by reversing the original decision of diverting the donations. If it had diverted the donations donor will loose trust in the organisation and will not come forward to help. When it maintains a policy of honoring donor intent people will trust it to stand by it and they donated for the victims of the terrorist attack and the donations must be spent on it only. Then the trust of the donors will not fall and if the organisation wants donations for other ancillary operation sit can genuinely ask for donations and there are many people who would be willing to help. This gives both trust and respect and also the cause is served. Hence the decision to reverse the original one is correct and a good move.
