<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
According to bartlett and Ghoshal, They suggest that companies should use the entry of foreign multinationals as an opportunity to learn from these competitors by benchmarking their operations and performance against them.
A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to conduct and operate a commercial or industrial business. A company may be organized in various ways for tax and financial liability purposes, depending on the corporate law of its jurisdiction.
A company means a legal entity or legal entity established under the Companies Act. It may be a limited or unlimited company, a private or public company, a limited liability company or company with share capital, or a company of common interest.
corporation means a company, partnership, association, corporation, trust, foundation, or organized group of individuals, whether incorporated or not, which (in its official capacity), Recipient, or similar officer or processor. Purpose of the above.
Learn more about the company here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
Elephant I would guess........
Answer:
B. Annuity due
Explanation:
Annuity Due
This is the repetition of money paid that is made at the beginning of each defined period. Period could be monthly, quarterly, yearly and so on. A common example used in explaining this is Rent paid at the beginning of each month. Annuity due have all payments in the same amount, like in this case, Janis is going to be paid $500 a month for 48 months. Meaning the amount tonbe paid doesnt changes. Also another characteristic of annuity payments is that all payments are paid at thesame time interval. Again, here, Janis is being paid every month at the same time interval NOT, today monthly and the next payment weekly.
It is a series of payments that is made or received over a predetermined period of time.
