Answer:
privatization I guess
Explanation:
in this government helps private workers
Answer:
Four days
Explanation:
After Benjamin Franklin proposed the idea of France aiding the US, it took France's King Louis XVI only FOUR DAYS to agree.
During the American war of independence against the British, the Americans at the time seek for help from the French leader which was approved by the French leader sending approximately 12,000 soldiers and 32,000 sailors to support the American war effort against the British.
Hence, the answer, in this case, is FOUR DAYS.
According to historical records, it was revealed that France under King Louis XVI decided to support the Americans after Four days when Benjamin Franklin when they requested assistance.
The common answer for this is that it is a joke. He was singing that because he was singing a few bars. This is a wordplay on the word bar of soap, and also on the fact that bars in music are <span>a segment of time corresponding to a specific number of </span><span>beats, so it's a pun actually.</span>
Answer:
Between 1640-1660, Great Britain enjoyed the greatest benefits of mercantilism. During this period, the prevailing economic wisdom suggested that the empire's colonies could supply raw materials and resources to the mother country and subsequently be used as export markets for the finished products.
Explanation:
Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has at least some of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] In the United States and most countries, corporations have a right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. In a U.S. historical context, the phrase 'Corporate Personhood' refers to the ongoing legal debate over the extent to which rights traditionally associated with natural persons should also be afforded to corporations. A headnote issued by the Court Reporter in the 1886 Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. claimed to state the sense of the Court regarding the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations, without the Court having actually made a decision or issued a written opinion on that point. This was the first time that the Supreme Court was reported to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause granted constitutional protections to corporations as well as to natural persons, although numerous other cases, since Dartmouth College v. Woodward in 1819, had recognized that corporations were entitled to some of the protections of the Constitution. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), the Court found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 exempted Hobby Lobby from aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because those aspects placed a substantial burden on the closely held company's owners' exercise of free religion.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
