Administered by the East India Company functioning as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown and regulated by the British Parliament. Governor-General.
They sought to select who would take the throne after them and who would be given administrative positions. The Company occasionally coerced the nations into forming a "subsidiary alliance". The conditions of this alliance prohibited the rulers of India from having their own independent armed forces.
The contemporary multinational has its roots in the English East India Company. Its global commerce network imported Asian luxuries including teas, silk, and spices. However, it also used opium to open up China's marketplaces and its private army to conquer most of India. They had a stranglehold on India's sizable market and cotton resources thanks to British economic policy. India functioned as a sizable captive market for British-produced products as well as a substantial source of raw materials for British industries.
Equal protection under the law: In all the Indian regions they directly controlled, the British enacted standardized laws. As a result, they helped lessen caste inequality in Indian society by denying upper caste members conventional social benefits.
Learn more about company rules:
brainly.com/question/16923117
#SPJ9
The term of office for a representative is two years
IAnswer:
Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,
Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>
Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.
Explanation:
The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)
It permitted the expansion of slavery beyond the southern states.
Answer:
The war was not worth fighting.
Explanation:
First of all, the American military was ill-prepared for the war because it did not know well what strategy the Vietcong would use against the American soldiers, as they did not expected the war to become almost a guerrilla warfare.
Secondly, the American military and government ignored Vietnam's geography, economy, society and history, and this made it difficult to understand the context, and garner support from the Vietnamese people.
Third, the war was held in a far away country that did not pose any direct threat to American citizens
Finally, the war caused heavy casualties to both sides, including Vietnamese civilians, that did not lead to a victory, since the American military technically lost the war as it had to retreat.
