Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 12.5% = 0.125
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 52
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis sates that 12.5% of U.S. workers belong to union and the alternate hypothesis states that there is a increase in union membership.
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.3812
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Answer:
<u>3</u> fewer fluids ounces the regular bottle of sunscreen holds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The family size bottle of sunscreen holds = 12 oz.
The regular bottle holds 75% less.
Now, to find how much fewer fluids ounces does the regular bottle of sunscreen holds.
So, according to question:
Therefore, 3 fewer fluids ounces the regular bottle of sunscreen holds.
Answer:
x=8y/3-4
Step-by-step explanation:
What we have to do to solve for X into re arrange the equation so that X is by itself on one side of the equation. To start we will divide both sides by 3/8 to move it away from the X side and we get
8y/3=x+4 then we will subtract both sides by 4 to get x all by itself
8y/3-4=x
I hope this helps and please don't hesitate to ask if there is anything still unclear!
Answer:
40
Step-by-step explanation:
4 lots of 10 is 10+10+10+10 or 4 x 10
Answer:
F. 6 x 22
Step-by-step explanation:
- 6 has more than two factors ( 1, 6, 2, 3), which makes it a composite number.
- 22 has more than two factors (1, 22, 2, 11), which makes it a composite number.
- Therefore, F is the correct answer.
