I believe the equation would be 765 -8t = 421. Then you would solve for t and get 43 seconds. I hope this helps!! :)
Answer:
y=-1/2x+24
Step-by-step explanation:
you solve for y by isolating the y on one side of the equation and the rest of the equation on the opposite side of the equal sign.
1/2x-1/2x+y=24-1/2x
y=24-1/2x
rewritten: y=-1/2x+24
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the slope, you must subtract the second y axis from the first y axis then the second x axis from the first x axis.
Problem: (5, 3) (-2, -4)
Solution: Step 1. - 4 - 3 = 7 (subtract the second y axis from the first y axis)
Step 2. - 2 - 5 = 7 (subtract the second x axis from the first x axis)
Answer: 7/7
Final Answer: 1
Mark me as brainliest!!
Answer:
isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let 
denote a set of elements. 
would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of 
.
For example, with 
, 
and 
are both members of . However, 
because the pairs are ordered.
A relation on is a subset of . For any two elements
, 
if and only if the ordered pair 
is in 
.
A relation on set is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:
- Reflexivity: for any
, the relation needs to ensure that 
(that is: 
.)
- Symmetry: for any , if and only if
. In other words, either both and 
are in , or neither is in .
- Transitivity: for any
, if and 
, then 
. In other words, if and 
are both in , then 
also needs to be in .
The relation (on ) in this question is indeed reflexive. 
, 
, and 
(one pair for each element of ) are all elements of .
isn't symmetric. 
but 
(the pairs in 
are all ordered.) In other words, 
isn't equivalent to 
under even though 
.
Neither is transitive. 
and 
. However, . In other words, under relation , 
and 
does not imply 
.
Yes it’s a rectangle because the diagonals bisect each other, and they are equal in length.
