Brutus' oration shows that he has sincerely acted on the behalf of Rome, and speaks plainly and to the point. He states his case as to why Caesar had to die, appealing to the crowd's reason, and convinces them of his honest intentions to do what he thought was best for Rome. In contrast, Mark Antony appeals to the crowd's emotion -- stating how Caesar had had the Roman welfare near and dear to his heart, ("When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept!" ) and what civic improvements he was to make for the Rome's benefit, as examples. He states that he and Caesar were friends, and dramatically reveals the stabbed, bloody corpse as a final persuasion that he was wrongfully murdered, and incites the crowd to punish Brutus and company for their wrongdoing
Answer:
1. does she like films.
2. I have not written the novels.
3. do you like this book?
4. architects make all the designs.
5. he did not recite a poem.
This is a tough one--I tried...
-bleak
-ghost
-dying
-sorrow
-nameless??
Other options
-maiden
-angel
-vainly
-Lenore (pretty sure this means light)
Answer:
Ambiguous facts.
Explanation:
A reader may always interpret; facts, symbols, etc... according to her/his own perspective. However, when you add ambiguousness to the fact, as the noun says, you create and cause confusion, as the fact is considered unclear. So if facts are always open to one's interpretation, an ambiguous fact is definitely super open to interpretation!
An example is “Belching smokestacks and the smell of rotting garbage.” He goes to great lengths to prove his point of how terrible it was live back then. Another example is when he describe the slaughtering if a hog in chapter three. The scene is very disgusting and is made in to a point.