Answer:
Originally, the intention of the ECPA Amendments Act was to provide government with warrantless access to any email if it had been kept for at least 180 days; a court order was required for access to any email. However, the House of Representatives later voted unanimously against warrantless government access to emails.
Answer:
The answer is - To serve as an outgroup
Explanation:
The options are;
a) to see if the lily and the orchids show all the same shared derived characters (synapomorphies)
b) to demonstrate likely homoplasies
c) to see if the lily is a cryptic orchid species
d) to serve as an outgroup
The answer is D- To serve as an Outgroup
A phylogenetic tree is also called an evolutionary tree and it shows the evolutionary relationships that exists among organisms called taxa based on their physical or genetic similarities and differences. The Phylogenetic tree consists of ingroup and outgroup. The ingroup consists of a group of closely related organisms or taxon while the outgroup represents a more distantly related group of organisms or taxon but as close as possible to the ingroup.
The Lily represents the outgroup in the phylogenetic tree while the Orchid are the ingroup. This is because the Lily is distantly related to the orchid.
The correct answer is D. Quaternary
Explanation:
In economy, there are mainly four economic sectors that cover the different economic activities a nation or state can have. These includes the primary sector that refers to extraction of raw materials including activities such as agriculture or fishing; the secondary sector that deals with the manufacturing process such as factories that produce bicycles; the tertiary sector that refers to services or intangible goods such as tourism and the quaternary sector that deals with information and knowledge services such as education or development or technology. Considering this, the sector of the economy in which someone working as a software developer would be is the quaternary as this sector deals with the development of technology and this includes the development of software.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
