Being rich like batman lmaooo
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
D because they do want all their freedom and don’t want the government to intervene
Answer:
Current issues between work and family institutions rather than preindustrial times.
Explanation:
The situation of Olivia are those current issues that exist between work and family life. In this situation, couples try to strike a balance between work activities and family responsibilities. Having a full time job could affect your family life as a woman. Due to pressures at work, she has limited time to spend with your kids and husband. Household responsibilities are shared between husband and wife to ensure that they are not neglected. Children have to prepare for school early enough which is a huge task for Olivia because she has to prepare for work too. So these are current issues that are faced by couples with full time job who are trying to meet their family responsibilities.
