Answer:
Mosaics - The Romans created beautiful mosaics on floors and walls. Some of this art is still being uncovered today!
Explanation:
(hope this helps)
Answer:
Religious athletes have higher moral development than nonreligious athletes.
Explanation:
Athletes such as skier, Rebecca Dussault and weightlifter, Kulsoom Abdullah have attributed their success or commitment to their faiths. Because of their strong beliefs in a higher power, religious athletes may be better able to handle the stress of training, the downs of losing and injury.
Also, common characteristics help teams bond and a team with members who have a shared love of their sports as well as a shared faith have more reasons over which they can bond.
However, being religious does not automatically mean an athlete will be more morally developed or a non religious athlete will be amoral.
Answer: onion
Explanation: If the child knows that a book is the one object and the child has just learned a new word, the child will associate the new word with the unfamiliar green onion as it is an object the child has never seen before.
Answer:
The conclusion is false, because it is assuming that correlation = causation.
Explanation:
An important principle in statistical analysis is the principle that when correlation exist between two variables or more, it does not mean that one of the variables are causing the other to appear in a certain manner.
Remember that correlation means that you are investigating whether a relationships exists between two variables; in this example, as we can see, it is between the biodiversity in an ecosystem and the population of an insect.
The graph can be said to illustrate the result of the research; that as the biodiversity of the ecosystem goes down, the insect's population goes up. This is a form of negative correlation.
However - we do not know what is the direction of the relationship; the student concludes that as some insects die within the ecosystem, the researched insect's population goes up; assuming that the predator species died off and thus the researched insect's population increases.
Yet, it is also possible for the relationship to go towards the other direction; the researched insect population increases - perhaps by the introduction of a new food source that causes the species' population to increase - and thus, this damages the biodiversity of the ecosystem, making the population go down since it is possible that the researched insect is instead the species which is on top of the food chain at that ecosystem.
To investigate the direction of a relationship, further research need to be done and more sophisticated statistical methods need to be used.
