The distributution of BioSand water filters is where they get there water.
Many people without disabilities get confused when they meet a person with disabilities. This is natural. We can all feel uncomfortable with the "different". This discomfort decreases and may even disappear when there are many opportunities for people with and without disabilities to live together.
Do not pretend that the disability does not exist. If you relate to a person with a disability as if they did not have a disability, you will ignore a very important characteristic of them. That way you will not be relating to her, but to someone else, one that you invented, which is not real.
Whenever you want to help, offer help. Always wait for your offer to be accepted before helping. Always ask the most appropriate way to do so. But do not be offended if your offer is refused. Well, people with disabilities don't always need help. Sometimes a particular activity can be better developed without assistance.
True is the answer to ur question
Answer:
Sherlock rewards his older son for cleaning up the garage by giving him $5. Later he is amused when his younger daughter, Lily, comes up to him later and asks, "Daddy, can I clean the garage tomorrow?" Lily most likely learned about the benefits of cleaning the garage through vicarious conditioning.
Explanation:
Vicarious conditioning is is a term for learning by observing others in the social learning model. Here the younger daughter Lily observed the interaction between her father and brother. She learned that if she cleaned the garage she would earn money.
Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
