Answer:
yes
Explanation:
In light of the recent elections in the USA, many fear “fake news” that have gradually become a powerful and sinister force, both in the news media environment as well as in the fair and free elections. The scenario draws into questions how the general public interacts with such outlets, and to what extent and in which ways individual responsibility should govern the interactions with social media.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Group of answer choices.
a. caregiver
b. criminal justice
c. domestic violence
d. social service
Answer:
a. caregiver
Explanation:
Domestic abuse can be defined as an act of excessive aggression against an elderly or aging person.
Elder abuse can be defined as a single or repeated intentional act or failure to act (neglect) that causes a risk of harm to an elderly (aging) person, especially occuring within a relationship in which adequate trust is expected.
A caregiver isn't the biological father or mother of a child or an adult, he or she has only agreed to play those roles for a predetermined amount of money.
The caregiver model of elder abuse and neglect views elder abuse as a form of unlawful family violence and focuses on negative personal characteristics of abusers and on a possible criminal justice response.
Based on what we know about the Unification of 1861, the correct statement is that<u> The new </u><u>nation </u><u>included much of </u><u>mainland Italy </u><u>and several </u><u>islands</u><u>.</u>
<h3>Unification of Italy in 1861</h3>
- This was the amalgamation of the various Italian states into a unified kingdom.
- Led to much of mainland Italy falling under the control of the King of Italy.
Before the unification, there were several states in Italy such as Tuscany, Venetia, the Papal States, and the Kingdom of Sardinia. Most of these states joined together in 1861 to make the unified kingdom of Sardinia.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on the Unification at brainly.com/question/14632644.
