The statement that the people very sensitive in taking risks totally avoid risks whenever possible is a TRUE statement. Such people do not fall under the category of risk-takers.
Risk ability is referred to as the desire to take risk based upon their risk profile and factors contributing to such decision like age, financial stability, responsibilities, etc.
<h3>Risk profile </h3>
- The person who are willing to take risks and move ahead are called the risk-takers. Whereas, people who are very reluctant and hesitant in taking risks are referred as the risk aversers in business terms.
- Risk aversion is the condition in which the person might not accept the difficult and extra rewarding alternative as there is a risk involved given that factors like age, stability, responsibilities, etc. also apply.
- To explain this, it can be stated that a risky investor doesn't sell off his securities if their market value is declining, however a risk sensitive person will sell them early to avoid further losses.
Hence, the statement regarding the risk sensitive person's ability to avoid risk whenever possible is TRUE.
To know more risk profile, click the link below.
brainly.com/question/7128161
Answer:
8000
Explanation:
200000 divided 100 multiply by 4% equal 8000
First we find the slope of the line:
m = (12-9) / (7000-17000) = - 0.0003
Then, the generic equation of the line is:
p-po = m (q-qo)
where
(po, qo): point that belongs to the line.
We have then:
p-12 = (- 0.0003) (q-7000)
Rewriting:
p = -0.0003 * q + 2.1 +12
p = -0.0003 * q + 14.1
answer:
the demand equation, assuming it is linear
p = -0.0003 * q + 14.1
The correct answer to this situation is the following.
Well, here we are facing an ethical dilemma. Alex thought that she "played her cards" optimally and benefited from the situation. The companies acted in "goodwill" and pay as promised all the expenses when they both sent the checks a weel later. But that is not the kind of conduct that is expected from an ethical professional. She is cheating in order to get money from the companies.
What she should have done is be honest and candidly express the real situation. That should have shown that she is a person of high values that respects the hard-earned money of the company and that she always acts with class, being honest and open.