Answer:
Matrixed organisations can be more efficient than conventional hierarchical organisations in maximising resource use and delivering job development at a faster rate. They could also be slightly frustrating, noisy and more effective if performed incorrectly.
Potential drawbacks in answering to several executives:
Specific Management goals
Diverse modes of service
Varying political strategies
Related Space Access
Specific timescales of their intentions
Potential benefits of answering to several executives:
Connection to a broader network
Chances to switch to other areas of the company improved
Project development opportunities to develop organisational skills
Expanded capabilities for the company to see the larger picture
Answer:
The combination of Microsoft's advertising outlets is called the media mix.
Explanation:
Media Mix refers to the fusion of all communication channels an organisation elects in trying to satisfy its marketing goals.
Besides the one channels already mentioned in the question, others may include newspapers, cable television, outdoor billboards, online and offline radio, websites, electronic mail, and social media.
Cheers!
Answer:
Note: The full question is attached as picture below
Below is in order, according to the amount of social distance (interpersonal space in a professional interaction) that would likely be expected during a business transaction in that particular country.
<em>1 = Least Social Distance: 5 = Most Social Distance:
</em>
<em></em>
1 - USA
2 - UK
3 - INDIA
4 - CHINA
5- SAUDI ARABIA
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
For Vaughn:
Equipment $16,080
Accumulated Depreciation $25,460
To Equipment $37,520
To Cash $4,020
(Being the exchange is recorded)
For Bramble:
Equipment(new) $16,750
Accumulated Depreciation $13,400
Cash $4,020
Loss on exchange(balance item) $3,350
To Equipment(old) $37,520
(Being the exchange is recorded)
Only these entries are passed and it attains lacking of commercial substance
Answer: three times as large
Explanation:
Economic order quantity will be calculated as follows:
EOQ = ✓(2DS/H)
D = Demand in units
Here S = Ordering cost = $10
H = Holding cost
Since S = $10
Therefore, EOQ will be:
= ✓(2DS/H)
= ✓(2 × 10 × D/ H)
= ✓(20D/H)
Since we're to increase the order cost from $10 per order to $90 per order, then EOQ will be:
Since S = $90
Therefore, EOQ will be:
= ✓(2DS/H)
= ✓(2 × 90 × D/ H)
= ✓(180D/H)
3✓20DH
The revised EOQ will then be 3 times as large.