Answer: The conderations has to be rotated, to avoid our choice being biased. Though on a strict note, we would want to consider first, the ones that has reasoned the same way with us.
Explanation: Just as we know that we can be deceived by our sense, so our thoughts can also deceive us. If we only wants people to act on our opinion, and reason the way we think, they will be many tendency of people not getting it right. Though we have to consider the ones that share the same thoughts with us, about terrorism , but our consideration should rotate to the ones that does not share the same thoughts with us, so that we won't be bias in our choice.
The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for three main reasons:
1) If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot ``feel'' this motion. Nor does this motion give rise to any obvious observational consequences. Hence, the Earth must be stationary.
—————————————
2) If the Earth is executing a circular orbit around the Sun then the positions of the stars should be slightly different when the Earth is on opposite sides of the Sun. This effect is known as parallax. Since no stellar parallax is observable (at least, with the naked eye), the Earth must be stationary. In order to appreciate the force of this argument, it is important to realize that ancient astronomers did not suppose the stars to be significantly further away from the Earth than the planets. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just beyond the orbit of Saturn.
—————————————
3)The geocentric model is far more philosophically attractive than the heliocentric model, since in the former model the Earth occupies a privileged position in the Universe.
Answer:
A. "If they can get away with it, so can I"
Explanation:
Social-psychological research has revealed that exposure to televised violence might weaken viewers' inhibitions about using violence in their own lives. In other words, this means that by watching violence on TV, people will more likely think that violence is an option they can use in their day-to-day life.
Therefore, if Peter is one person that might be inhibited when watching violence on TV, he will likely think "if they can get away with it, so can I" when he watches a violent cops-and-robbers show since he will think that violence is an option in his day-to-day life.
Answer:
The focus of classical and operant conditioning is on external stimuli, responses and reinforcement; the focus of the cognitive learning approach is on internal thoughts and expectations of learning.
Explanation:
Classical and operant conditioning focus on the observable, such as <em>conducts and behaviors</em> the individual carries out. Both conditioning types try to produce a specific behavior on the individual through <em>stimulus, responses and reinforcement. </em>
Meanwhile, the cognitive learning approach, as the name states, focuses on the individual's cognition, meaning <em>its internal functions and processes,</em> saying there's more to the individual than what is observable. It focuses on one's <em>expectations</em> regarding learning.
