1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jenyasd209 [6]
3 years ago
8

Find the inverse Laplace transform f(t) of the function F(s). Write uc for the Heaviside function that turns on at c, not uc(t).

F(s) = (7e−7s)/(s2 − 49)f(t) =
Mathematics
1 answer:
zzz [600]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

F(t)=\frac{-1}{2}e^{7(t-7)}+\frac{1}{2}e^{-7(t-7)}

Step-by-step explanation:

We have given F(S)=\frac{7e^{-7s}}{s^2-49}

Now  F(S)=e^{-7s}G(s)

Here G(S)=\frac{7}{S^2-49}

Now first find the Laplace inverse of G(S)

Using partial fraction

\frac{7}{(s+7)(s-7)}=\frac{A}{(S+7)}+\frac{B}{S-7}

7=A(S-7)+B(S+7)

On comparing the coefficient

A=\frac{1}{2}  and B=\frac{-1}{2}  

On putting the value of A and B  

G(S)=\frac{-1}{2(S+7)}+\frac{1}{2(S+7)}

Taking inverse Laplace

G(t)=\frac{-1}{2}e^{7t}+\frac{1}{2}e^{-7t}

Now in G(s) there is onether term e^{-7s}

So F(t)=\frac{-1}{2}e^{7(t-7)}+\frac{1}{2}e^{-7(t-7)}

You might be interested in
How do you solve this question
Wewaii [24]

<h2>Solution:.</h2>

Let the ceilings be <em>a</em><em> </em><em>&</em><em> </em><em>b</em>

and the distance from one corner of the ceiling to the opposite be <em>c</em>

<em>then </em><em>using</em><em> </em><em>Pythagoras</em><em> theorem</em>

c =  \sqrt{a {}^{2} +  b  {}^{2} } \\  c =    \sqrt{16 {}^{2} +  12  {}^{2} } \\ c =  \sqrt{256 + 144 }  \\ c =  \sqrt{400}  \\ c = 20

hence ,c .°. the distance from one corner of the ceiling to the opposite is<em> </em><em>2</em><em>0</em>

3 0
2 years ago
Determine whether the sequence converges or diverges. If it converges, give the limit.
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

The given series converges and \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n =0

Step-by-step explanation:

Given is 108, -18, 3,...

It is an alternate series. An alternate series is convergent if:

1. The series is decreasing.

2. If the last term (n-th term) of series converges to 0.

<u>Since each next term is less than its preceding term, so it is decreasing.</u>

First term, a = 108

Second term = -18

Common ratio, r = -18/108 = -1/6

General term, aₙ = a*rⁿ = 108*(-1/6)ⁿ

<u>When n increases to infinity, the exponent term will decreases to zero, and last term (n-th term) will converge to 0 as well.</u>

Hence, the given series converges.

Now limit will be: \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n

\lim_{n \to \infty} 108*(-1/6)^n \\= 108*(-1/6)^\infty \\= 108*(1/\infty) \\= 108*0 \\= 0

Hence, \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n =0

7 0
3 years ago
The inverse of the function graphed below is a function.<br><br>A. True<br>B. False
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
False.  In order to have an inverse, your function must pass the horizontal line test.  The graph fails the test.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The number of events is 29​, the number of trials is 298​, the claimed population proportion is​ 0.10, and the significance leve
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.0973 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{298}}}=-0.155  

p_v =2*P(Z  

And we can use excel to find the p value like this: "=2*NORM.DIST(-0.155;0;1;TRUE)"

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is not significantly different from 0.1 .  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=298 represent the random sample taken

X=29 represent the events claimed

\hat p=\frac{29}{298}=0.0973 estimated proportion

p_o=0.1 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is 0.1 or no.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0973 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{298}}}=-0.155  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z  

And we can use excel to find the p value like this: "=2*NORM.DIST(-0.155;0;1;TRUE)"

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is not significantly different from 0.1 .  

We can do the test also in R with the following code:

> prop.test(29,298,p=0.1,alternative = c("two.sided"),conf.level = 1-0.05,correct = FALSE)

7 0
2 years ago
7 7/8 - 3 1/4 equals what
ELEN [110]
The difference of 7 and 7/8 and 3 1/4 can be restated as the difference between 63/8 and 13/4. This is just a change from mixed numbers to improper fractions. 

We must now get a common denominator (the bottom part of a fraction). To get 8, we must multiply by 2 to the denominator of 13/4. Since we want this number to stay in the same value, we have to multiply the numerator by 2 as well (top part of the fraction). Therefore, we are getting the difference of 63/8 and 26/8. Doing this, we get (63-26)/8, so the answer is 37/8 = 4 5/8
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Helpppppppppp mehhhhh plz
    8·1 answer
  • Using the completing-the-square method, find the vertex of the function f(x) = 2x2 − 8x + 6 and indicate whether it is a minimum
    13·1 answer
  • If SE = 7 and EG = 20 , then SG =
    5·1 answer
  • Jane has a checkbook balance of $68.00 she then writes two checks .one for $5.00 and one for $62.50 she also deposits $75.00 she
    8·1 answer
  • Genie is a dental hygienist. She has 15 boxes of mint dental floss that have 16.4
    8·2 answers
  • Write the equation of a line that is PERPENDICULAR to the line y=3x-4 and passes through the point (-6,1)​
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me solve this question will give you braisnlt !
    7·1 answer
  • What’s 3/5 + 3/2 need help okay
    12·1 answer
  • Find the length of the side of a square whose area is equal to the area of a rectangle with side measures 4.9 m and 1.6 m​
    14·1 answer
  • A student ran a distance of miles each day for 5 days. Then the student ran a distance of 44 miles each day for the next 5 days.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!