I think that it could be argued whether or not he was "bad" but he definitely wasn't the best.
The biggest arguments for John Adams as a bad president:
1) He acted too much on his own beliefs and didn't go along with any party. Didn't go against Washington's wishes and enter war against France, which a lot of people disagreed with.
2) The Alien Acts made it easier to deport foreigners, and made it more difficult for immigrants to vote. The sedition acts were basically a form of censorship that prevented people from saying negative things about the government.
3) He was not as religious as many other politicians at the time, and is famous for saying that the United States is not a Christian country.
Basically, he did things based on his own beliefs and didn't go along with any one party. This caused both parties to hate him, and some could say that it led to the death of the Federalist party since they were without any real leader during this time.
I think it would be B)International
Truman ruled out huge commitments of troops and atomic weapons.
The correct answer is:
Monarchs had to respect certain basic rights of citizens.
The Magna Carta, Magna Carta Libertatum (latin) which means "The Great Charter" is a charter issued by King John of England, which established for the first time that everybody, including the king should obey the law. It basically was the start of protecting the rights of the citizens, and limited the monarchs power. This charter was created to deal with the political crisis in 1215.
The rule of law is the legal principle that law should govern a nation, as opposed to being governed by decisions of individual government officials. It primarily refers to the influence and authority of law within society, particularly as a constraint upon behaviour, including behaviour of government officials.
