1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yakvenalex [24]
3 years ago
12

Have you ever had your beliefs challenged by others? How did you react? How would you react if this happened to you?

History
2 answers:
nadezda [96]3 years ago
3 0
I have not because you have to be strong in what you believe in you can’t let somebody else sway the way YOU think about whatever it is you think about
lyudmila [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Yes.

Explanation: My beliefs have been challenged before, I let them say what they had to say then I told them my beliefs. It's never a good idea to get mad at someone challening your beliefs.

You might be interested in
Why was the Polynesia lathe last part of oceania
Digiron [165]

Answer:

Polynesia was the last part of Oceania to be settled because it is so remote

Explanation:

I searched it up

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes why most Northern men joined the fight against the South?
Hitman42 [59]
They were afraid of what might happen if the Union were to dissolve
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The judicial branch of the US government has the power to
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
B. interpret laws. apart that it's easy, I also make sure to look it up to make sure
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to maximize profits early in the nineteenth century, what was a common practice of business owners?
Natasha_Volkova [10]
A common practice was to pay ridicilously small wages to workers themselves and pay even less to children and women who were working at factories. Another thing that was done was to either import foreign workers who would have to work for even less, or to move production to companies overseas where they would set up a distribution and where workers themselves would also have to work for very small amounts of money. This increased their profit margins. 
7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLLLLLZZZZ HELP I AM GIVING 50 POINTS AND I AM GIVING BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • 5. Why did the Jews have to turn in their belongings and valuables?
    13·1 answer
  • What does Popular Sovereignty mean? What does it help to prevent?
    9·1 answer
  • Fascist parties are MOST likely to take over governments that have which of these traits?
    13·1 answer
  • Who were some of the main women involved in the push for equality for women in the 19th century?
    11·1 answer
  • What is a primary source?
    9·2 answers
  • As the Civil War drew to a conclusion, the chief concern of Republicans in Congress was that
    13·1 answer
  • First CORRECT answer gets brainliest.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the first Act used to raise revenue from colonies?
    7·2 answers
  • How were the Allies victorious in the :
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!