A human life is so valuable that no single price should be placed on it. The effect on this stance on bioethical issues however, is relative.
<h3>Relativity of Human value to Bioethical issues</h3>
- A person's stance on a bioethical issue can be based on which human life they value more, the person that will gain, or the one that will be affected.
- With abortion, one might argue that the value of the mother is higher than the baby's because not having to take care of a child will give her a better life.
- Designer babies might be more valuable because their lower rate of birth defects mean that they are tougher and less expensive to maintain.
- Stem cell research could save many lives so more value might be placed on these lives than the embryos affected.
In conclusion, a person can see another life as valuable yet have relative views on bioethical issues.
Find out more on stem cell research at brainly.com/question/5409171.
The area of land<span> that is drained by a particular </span>river<span> and its tributaries is </span>called <span>either a </span>river<span> basin or </span>drainage<span> basin. </span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Animals can be categorized into 3 based on body symmetry
- <em>Those without any body symmetry (asymmetrical)</em>
- <em>Those with bilateral body symmetry (bilateria)</em>
- <em>Those with radial body symmetry (Radiata)</em>
Animals can be categorized into 2 based on number of embryonic germ layer;
- <em>Those with two layers - endoderm and ectoderm (diplobastic)</em>
- <em>Those with three layers - mesoderm in addition to ectoderm and endoderm (triploblastic)</em>
Animals can be categorized based on presence/absence of body cavity or coelom;
- <em>No body cavity - acoelomates</em>
- <em>False body cavity - pseudocoelomates</em>
- <em>True body cavity - coelomates</em>
Animals can be categorized into 2 based on characteristics of embryonic development;
- <em>Deuterostomes</em>
- <em>Protosomes</em>