Answer: Feudalism as a fundamental socio-economic relationship of the Middle Ages.
Explanation:
Feudalism implied a hierarchy in which all social classes were included, and it functioned for centuries during the Middle Ages. At the top of the "feudal pyramid" was a king who allocated land to nobles or feudal lords, on that land worked serfs who took part of the income from the land for themselves, and in case of war, the feudal lord, in turn, had to assign a certain number of soldiers. Was a larger feudal lord had to provide a larger number of majors). The disappearance of the feudal system occurred with the emergence of the first economic relations, i.e., the emergence of private property; the king no longer had to allocate land to have an army but could hire and pay from the state treasury. Fundamental changes in economic relations that are still relevant today occurred during the XIX. century. Namely, this is the Industrial Revolution period when large capitalists appear, who pay taxes to the state for their activities, and economic relations are still in force today.
The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
What’s the options for this question?
Answer:
short-term
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of memories, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Samantha has stored the information in her short-term memory. This can be said because based on the question Samantha studied every day up to the day of the exam (short term) therefore she had the information clear in her mind for the test.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
I believe it would be B. I kinda know what it's like.
