<span>(a) Which large areas were united under one ruler? Give at least three examples
Three large areas that were united under one ruler are the Roman empire, The Alexander Magnus Empire, and the Mongolian Empire. Those three represents three empires in the history of humanity that united under one ruler huge areas, that extended between continents and different countries throughout the Earth.
(b) Which rulers of dynasties, governments, kings, or emperors united large areas under one rule? Give at least three examples.
As for the Roman Empire, it was Julio Cesar who united the brought the Empire at the peak of its power. In the case of Alexander Magnus, it was him that took the Macedonian and Greek power outsider their border governing a huge area of territories. As for the Mongolian Empire, the principal ruler and conqueror was Genghis Khan, which united the tribes and extended the influnce of its country to new reaches.
(c) What are some strategies or practices rulers have used to unify diverse people in their empires under one rule? Cite at least three strategies or practices and mention some rulers or governments that used each of those strategies.
The principal strategy in the Roman Empire was divide and conquer. They divided the enemy army into small pieces and then defeat each of them separately. Alexander Magnus used a strategy that trapped the enemy army inside a pincer. Genghis Khan often </span><span>resorted to inciting internal revolt among the enemy supporters.</span>
Answer:
prophet: a religious figure......
bedouin: the act of being obedient....
nomadic: moving from place to place......
The Roman Forum was a complex of great squares and temples and miles of covered markets. For many years, it was the it was the site of important elections, public speeches, criminal trials, and also Gladiator fights. The citizens called the place Forum Magnum. The correct answer is D.
The different branches of the government help limit the power of the federal government because there are checks and balances with each branch and if one branch doesn't quite agree with the executive branch then the two other branches can overrule the president's power.
Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
