I don’t see the answer like the first person that commented so good luck!
Two things societies with iron technology developed socially are "divisions of labor" and "<span>hierarchical social classes," since these societies were generally more advanced than their counterparts. </span>
Hello! The answer to your question would be <em>Newt Gingrich, Armey, Armey Gingrich, Dr Newt Gingrich.</em>
<em>If you are talking about the book I suppose</em>
<em>P.S (Do mind the fact that there is just Armey as one of the authors, the first name is an inappropriate word that Brainly does not allow me to put in)</em>
The Cold War started because of United States and Soviet Unions difference in view when it comes to Communism. US became more and more concerned with how the Soviet Union are showing their "expansive tendencies" when it comes to their dealings with Europe. The long telegram that was sent to the Department of State became the greatest foundation of the America's Cold War Policy of containment.
The Soviet Unions aggressive speeches and actions against Iran and Turkey gave way to the Truman's administration to show a stronger stance instead of a diplomatic approach that the previous administrations were doing. These factors guaranteed acceptance of Kennan's analysis that was expressed on the telegram.
Answer:
Yes he deserves to be called a Hero.
Explanation:
This is because Napoleon fought all battles alone without the support of any other nation. He was a great leader, always at the forefront of the action. The people of Europe picked up the ideas of Nationalism and Liberalism from France. People of Europe tired of seeing their nations used as pawns against the British. As a result, nationalism developed in many European nations. The countries which were under the dominance of Napoleon, adopted many of the very military and administrative reforms that had made France so strong.
Connelly's summaries of the action are clear and concise; his description of the social and political context in which Napoleon fought is beautiful, his portrayal of the personalities of Napoleon's marshals is lively and insightful; and his portrait of Napoleon's ambition and drive to win is excellent.