it is freedom of speech
that would be the first amendment the 2nd one Is right to bear arms
As a result, in 1819 a court case involving the existence of the national bank<span> made it all the way to the Supreme Court. </span>In the<span> case of Maryland vs. McCulloch, the </span>state<span> of Maryland </span>attempted to put a halt on operations at the Second Bank of the United States<span>. :)</span>
They however of them as lower than them and that they had a kind of control over them since they gave the nourishment to them. This is demonstrated when the Karankawas constrained the Spaniards to end up healers by withholding sustenance from them. After that, however, the Indians started demonstrating appreciation towards them by denying themselves of nourishment to give the Spaniards and gave them skins as a byproduct of their mending strategies. Thus, you realize that along with these lines, the perceived the significance of the Spaniards to their kin.
Despite the original purpose of the articles of confederation, from its beginning the delegates were determined to address the issues of a weak central government.
<h3>The reasons for the revision of the article.</h3>
The reason why the article was to be revised was the fact that it lacked the ability to assign several powers to the federal government of the country.
This inability made the federal government unable to discharge some of its duties to the country.
Read more on the articles of confederation here:
brainly.com/question/13152253
The battle you are referring to is actually called the Battle of the Ironclads. In this battle, it was the Merrimac (from the Confederacy) versus the USS Monitor (from the Union). This was the first battle between iron-fortified vessels in the Civil War. This battle ended up in a draw but represented a new form of fighting that both the Union and Confederacy had to be ready for.
