That's a lot of questions! You need not give me the "brainliest," as I may only respond to a couple of those points for the sake of time here.
#2 in your list: In Lincoln's first inaugural address, he said: "Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy." In other words, if states could choose to secede from the union, then there was really no union and no government. (Anarchy is the absence of government.) Only if we abide by the constitutional checks we place on ourselves in a democratic republic are we exercising genuine government. Otherwise, we fall into chaos or some sort of dictatorial state. Lincoln felt that the whole concept of self-government was at stake, threatened by the South's desire to secede. Lincoln had to treat the secession of several states as an act of rebellion.
#5 in your list (closely related to #2): The states that had seceded already had caused the civil war, in Lincoln's estimation. The northern states had to respond to hold the union together. The southern states claimed to be afraid for their property, peace and safety with an administration like Lincoln's in charge. But Lincoln saw those fears as unfounded, that all states would continue to enjoy their constitutional privileges. But seceding from the union cut them off from all stability and security.
Answer:
It did not rely on enslaved laborers.
This is because they did have slaves as the lowest class, but they did not rely on them to build things. The only times they relied on the slaves was when they needed extra soldiers for wars, or needed something built urgently.
Explanation:
Article 2<span> of the United States </span>Constitution<span> is the section that makes the executive branch of the government. The Executive branch of the government is the branch that has the responsibility and authority for the administration throughout the day of the state.</span>
The correct answer is letter B
A War Hawk is a term generally applied to those members of the House of Representatives who, in the face of a situation of tension or dispute, especially in foreign policy, tend to choose a more aggressive rhetoric or a military solution.
