Answer:
I think ,it`s D.
Explanation:
Everyone has his own view on something ,in particular business .Why should you change your idea ? Who knows maybe you are the next Einstein who can find a diamond in a desert ?
A positive relationship between the expected return on a security and its beta is justified because there is likely to be a positive discrepancy between the market's return and the risk-free rate.
What do you mean by the significance of the beta coefficient explain it?
The beta coefficient calculates the likelihood that the price of a stock or security will fluctuate in response to changes in the market price. A stock or security's beta can also be used to calculate the systematic risks connected to investment.
What is the significance of the beta coefficient concerning the risk of security?
A stock's volatility can be compared to the systematic risk of the entire market using a beta coefficient. The slope of a line through a regression of data points is known statistically as beta.
Learn more about the relationship between the expected return on a security and its beta: brainly.com/question/24000487
#SPJ4
The agriculture in Brazil is focused on sugarcane. Ethanol is also produced by the Brazilian sugarcane industry. The primarily agricultural product of Colombia is coffee. Colombia is the 4th largest producer of coffee in the world. Chile is the large producer of apples, pears and grapes ( fruit industry ). One forth of the Argentina exports are mostly cereals: corn, soybean, wheat and maize.
Answer:
Brazil - sugarcane,
Colombia - coffee,
Chile - fruit industry,
Argentina - cereals.
Answer:
Sagoff's cost-benefit approach establishes that the value of a thing is determined by how much people are willing to pay for it, so the only important values are the ones that the market can assign. This is why that approach is not suitable for explaining our duties with our environment, since we cannot pay for it and the market cannot assign any value to the environment.
Sagoff is a neo-Kantian ethicist because he also believes that individuals were the judges of value (they could assign value to things) not only for them but for their whole communities.
Sagoff's approach differs from Kant's approach since Sagoff believes that the cost-benefit approach doesn't apply to all the goods and services, especially the environment. He believes that the environment has an intrinsic value and therefore is an end to itself, while Kant believed that only humans had intrinsic value and could be an end to themselves.
Yes because there is no individual opinion, creative input.
