A company making profit from genetically modified potatoes would probably only say good things about genetically modified profits, so they'd likely be biased.
A book written by a freelance author whose previous books were about other scientific issues would likely have the book about genetic modification in general, rather than the historical development of it, so his book wouldn't be the best source to use.
A book written by a woman who believes she got sick from genetically modified products would probably be biased against genetically modified products, so her book wouldn't be the best source.
A book written by a scientist who helped develop the technology to genetically modify vegetables would probably know a lot about the historical development, considering he helped develop it. This is the best source to use in my opinion.
Pick a hypothesis and research it
Explanation:
Hello I would like to telly you that you must wash your school I will not come back all the week
Answer:
c because it should be you would drown.
Answer:
The book may be introductory, but it can satisfy a scholar.
Explanation:
In any argument presentation be it in an academic paper or any book for that matter, the presence of any phrases like "sound lines' ' will show an emphasis on the fact that the presented argument is to a certain extent, true and has validation. At the same time, the words "amply provide" will imply that the sources or argument presented is enough to prove the given point. These two phrases thus, help make the argument that the given points may be introductory but at the same time, they can also satisfy a scholar's viewpoint.
