Answer:
-9^5
Step-by-step explanation:
(-9)*(-9)*... is -9^5
Please mark as Brainliest! :)
Have a nice day.
The total length was 6 m.
One of the tables was 1.8 m
Subtract 1.8 from 6 to find the total length of the other two tables:
6 - 1.8 = 4.2m
The other two tables are the same size, so now divide 4.2 m by 2:
4.2 / 2 = 2.1
The other tables are 2.1 m long.
It would take about 25 months for the cost of leasing a billboard be the same for both companies.
<h3>
Linear function</h3>
A linear function is in the form:
y = mx + b
Where y,x are variables, m is the rate of change and b is the initial value of y.
Let P represent the cost to lease a billboard from a different company for x months. Given that:
P(x) = 100x
For the second company, let C represent the cost, hence using the table point (1, 580) and (5, 900):
C - 580 = [(900 - 580)/(5 - 1)](x - 1)
C = 80x + 500
For the same cost:
100x = 80x + 500
x = 25 months
It would take about 25 months for the cost of leasing a billboard be the same for both companies.
Find out more on Linear function at: brainly.com/question/15602982
Answer:
it is
possible
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>sum of the two shortest sides must be greater than the third side.</u>
so
4+7 < 9
11<9
condition satisfies ,
hence proved , we can draw
Use the chain rule:
<em>y</em> = tan(<em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6)
<em>y'</em> = sec²(<em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6) × (<em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6)'
<em>y'</em> = (2<em>x</em> - 5) sec²(<em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6)
Perhaps more explicitly: let <em>u(x)</em> = <em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6, so that
<em>y(x)</em> = tan(<em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6) → <em>y(u(x))</em> = tan(<em>u(x)</em> )
By the chain rule,
<em>y'(x)</em> = <em>y'(u(x))</em> × <em>u'(x)</em>
and we have
<em>y(u)</em> = tan(<em>u</em>) → <em>y'(u)</em> = sec²(<em>u</em>)
<em>u(x)</em> = <em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6 → <em>u'(x)</em> = 2<em>x</em> - 5
Then
<em>y'(x)</em> = (2<em>x</em> - 5) sec²(<em>u</em>)
or
<em>y'(x)</em> = (2<em>x</em> - 5) sec²(<em>x</em> ² - 5<em>x</em> + 6)
as we found earlier.
