1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga nikolaevna [1]
3 years ago
6

" alt="4x - 6 = - 2x - 16 - 2" align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula">

Mathematics
1 answer:
cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
3 0
This is the answer hope it helps

You might be interested in
Find the length of h. Round your answer to the hundredths place if you get a decimal
Luda [366]

Answer:

sheeeeeeeeeeeeeesh

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Use undetermined coefficient to determine the solution of:y"-3y'+2y=2x+ex+2xex+4e3x​
Kitty [74]

First check the characteristic solution: the characteristic equation for this DE is

<em>r</em> ² - 3<em>r</em> + 2 = (<em>r</em> - 2) (<em>r</em> - 1) = 0

with roots <em>r</em> = 2 and <em>r</em> = 1, so the characteristic solution is

<em>y</em> (char.) = <em>C₁</em> exp(2<em>x</em>) + <em>C₂</em> exp(<em>x</em>)

For the <em>ansatz</em> particular solution, we might first try

<em>y</em> (part.) = (<em>ax</em> + <em>b</em>) + (<em>cx</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + <em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

where <em>ax</em> + <em>b</em> corresponds to the 2<em>x</em> term on the right side, (<em>cx</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) corresponds to (1 + 2<em>x</em>) exp(<em>x</em>), and <em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>) corresponds to 4 exp(3<em>x</em>).

However, exp(<em>x</em>) is already accounted for in the characteristic solution, we multiply the second group by <em>x</em> :

<em>y</em> (part.) = (<em>ax</em> + <em>b</em>) + (<em>cx</em> ² + <em>dx</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + <em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

Now take the derivatives of <em>y</em> (part.), substitute them into the DE, and solve for the coefficients.

<em>y'</em> (part.) = <em>a</em> + (2<em>cx</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + (<em>cx</em> ² + <em>dx</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 3<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

… = <em>a</em> + (<em>cx</em> ² + (2<em>c</em> + <em>d</em>)<em>x</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 3<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

<em>y''</em> (part.) = (2<em>cx</em> + 2<em>c</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + (<em>cx</em> ² + (2<em>c</em> + <em>d</em>)<em>x</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 9<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

… = (<em>cx</em> ² + (4<em>c</em> + <em>d</em>)<em>x</em> + 2<em>c</em> + 2<em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 9<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

Substituting every relevant expression and simplifying reduces the equation to

(<em>cx</em> ² + (4<em>c</em> + <em>d</em>)<em>x</em> + 2<em>c</em> + 2<em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 9<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

… - 3 [<em>a</em> + (<em>cx</em> ² + (2<em>c</em> + <em>d</em>)<em>x</em> + <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 3<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)]

… +2 [(<em>ax</em> + <em>b</em>) + (<em>cx</em> ² + <em>dx</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + <em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)]

= 2<em>x</em> + (1 + 2<em>x</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 4 exp(3<em>x</em>)

… … …

2<em>ax</em> - 3<em>a</em> + 2<em>b</em> + (-2<em>cx</em> + 2<em>c</em> - <em>d</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 2<em>e</em> exp(3<em>x</em>)

= 2<em>x</em> + (1 + 2<em>x</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 4 exp(3<em>x</em>)

Then, equating coefficients of corresponding terms on both sides, we have the system of equations,

<em>x</em> : 2<em>a</em> = 2

1 : -3<em>a</em> + 2<em>b</em> = 0

exp(<em>x</em>) : 2<em>c</em> - <em>d</em> = 1

<em>x</em> exp(<em>x</em>) : -2<em>c</em> = 2

exp(3<em>x</em>) : 2<em>e</em> = 4

Solving the system gives

<em>a</em> = 1, <em>b</em> = 3/2, <em>c</em> = -1, <em>d</em> = -3, <em>e</em> = 2

Then the general solution to the DE is

<em>y(x)</em> = <em>C₁</em> exp(2<em>x</em>) + <em>C₂</em> exp(<em>x</em>) + <em>x</em> + 3/2 - (<em>x</em> ² + 3<em>x</em>) exp(<em>x</em>) + 2 exp(3<em>x</em>)

4 0
2 years ago
All right angles are congruent. Converse Inverse: Contrapositive
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

No not all right angles are congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Ux+ rx= w; solving for x
taurus [48]
<h2><u>ANSWER</u></h2><h3>UX+RX=W</h3><h3>LETS TAKE X COMMON</h3><h3>X(U+R)=W</h3><h3>X=W/(U+R)</h3>

x = w  \div {u + r}

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help asap! i need to submit this soon and I don’t get it!
madreJ [45]

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

linear must be straight

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Answer All please (13 points)
    9·1 answer
  • An athlete ran 42000 m in 2 hour 20 minutes.- 140min
    7·1 answer
  • -3(-5)-3y=-6 find the value of y
    15·1 answer
  • Bill has 2/3 of his pizza left from lunch. If he eats 3/7 more of the pizza, how much pizza is left?
    11·2 answers
  • Which decimal is less than 0.8?
    5·1 answer
  • If three of the exterior angles of an equiangular polygon is total 90 degrees how many sides does the polygon have
    9·1 answer
  • Austin made 5 quarts of his special from-scratch cupcake mix. He was able to make 32 identical cupcakes using 3.5 quarts of his
    7·1 answer
  • Solve for x PLS HELP NOW
    14·2 answers
  • Which tiles should be added to the model below to make zero?​
    11·1 answer
  • The circle has a radius of 6 inches find it’s approximate area and circumference.. use 3.14
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!