One of the major reasons for which the Arab (Palestinian) -Israeli conflict is so hard to be settled is that, in a way, both sides would like to gave control over all the territory. The Palestinians remember having more control over the land, and any peace treaty would leave them disappointed, and the Israeli side would like to have a secure state in a hostile environment (for many other reasons other countries in the Middle-East are hostile to Israel), but it is also likely that Israel also doesn't want to give up on land, as seen by the settlements.
Politically, one of the two parties that rule and have influence over Palestine, Hamas, is considered to be a terrorist organization by many, which makes the Israeli side not trusting the Palestinian side in peace with Israel. However, current leadership of Israel also does not want to grant Palestinian independence. The radical parties in both counties are fueled by mutual distrust and in this way a vicious circle happens.
Note that this is a very controversial topic, and many will likely disagree with this. <span />
To Thank the Gods the Aztecs would capture other tribes and paint them blue because it would help bring more crops food and keep the sickness out Aztecs would cut the heart out and then cut their head off (mesoamerica) they would torture and then feed their animals to sacrifice them
What was likely to result from the interaction between population trends in the colonies and the line fixed by the Proclamation of 1763? The conflict would likely result, as colonists pushed for settlement in the land reserved for Indians.
