1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergij07 [2.7K]
3 years ago
15

Explain how the geography impacts the economic + political development of ancient greece.

History
1 answer:
skad [1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Greece's geography impacted social, political, and economic patterns in a variety of ways, such as that its mountains prevented complete unification, led to the establishment of the city states near the sea, led to a reliance on naval powers, hindered overland trade, and encouraged maritime trade around the ...Explanation:

You might be interested in
What 2 things do Conservatives believe in?
Karolina [17]

Answer:

A) and C) I really hope this helped

3 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
History of bandaging
mr_godi [17]

Answer:

hope you like it

Explanation:

A bandage is a piece of material used either to support a medical device such as a dressing or splint, or on its own to provide support to or to restrict the movement of a part of the body. When used with a dressing, the dressing is applied directly on a wound, and a bandage used to hold the dressing in place. Other bandages are used without dressings, such as elastic bandages that are used to reduce swelling or provide support to a sprained ankle. Tight bandages can be used to slow blood flow to an extremity, such as when a leg or arm is bleeding heavily.

Bandages are available in a wide range of types, from generic cloth strips to specialized shaped bandages designed for a specific limb or part of the body. Bandages can often be improvised as the situation demands, using clothing, blankets or other material. In American English, the word bandage is often used to indicate a small gauze dressing attached to an adhesive bandage.

5 0
2 years ago
What was the main intention of the treaty of versailles?
Alchen [17]
To end World War 1, and to have Germany pay reparations for causing the war.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the five terms of the Compromise of 1850. The slave trade was ended in the North. Missouri was admitted as a slave state.
beks73 [17]
The best and most correct answers among the choices provided by the question are the following

<span> 1. The slave trade was ended in the North. Missouri was admitted as a slave state.
2. Popular sovereignty was established for New Mexico and Utah.
3. California was admitted as a free state.
4. A stringent fugitive slave law was passed Slaves would be freed if they went into the Northeastern states.
5. The slave trade was outlawed in the District of Columbia.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What important change occurred during Andrew Jackson’s presidency
    11·2 answers
  • Which industry benefited most from the Bessemer process?
    10·1 answer
  • What actions led to conflict between colonists in New England and local American Indians?
    10·1 answer
  • What does De Las Casas accomplish by including his comparison between the Romans’ treatment of Spain to the Spaniards’ treatment
    15·1 answer
  • How old was sir isaac newton when he died
    8·1 answer
  • HELP this is due at 11:59
    7·1 answer
  • Which part of the Declaration of Independence mostly show how the founding fathers were influenced by John Locke's theory of nat
    9·1 answer
  • Why is freedom of the press important?
    8·1 answer
  • Match these Germanic tribal names. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a major concern of the Anti-Federalists?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!