Answer:
There was a trade-related impact; the increase of global trade had an enormous effect on the Old and New World.
The correct answer is France. They wanted to weaken Britain who was a major force in Europe and they also had good relations with British colonies so they decided to help hoping that one day when the war is over the colonies would work together with France and trade and things like that.
"<span>They attempted to convert Indians and therefore win favor with God" would be the best option, sine the Puritans thought that if they "saved" Indians they too would be saved. </span>
A, the colonists had no direct representation in Parliament. One of the oft-cited quotes of the time is "No taxation without representation"
Answer:
The Arizona v. United States decision struck down all Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration.
Explanation:
Federalism is a form of government that stands in direct opposition to the notion of centralism, that is, to the form of political organization of states in which power appears centralized in the hands of a single governing group. Federalism, for its part, allows power (and the freedom to make decisions) to be distributed independently to the federal, state, and local government.
Under federalism, the rules governing immigration matters are different for the federal government, the state government, and the place where one can set their own guidelines for this. With regard to immigration, we can say that since the 1990s, states have increasingly adopted the political domain of immigration, and state involvement in immigration is partly due to their interest in preventing illegal immigrants from accessing public services, as educational and welfare benefits. In addition, we can state that federal immigration laws outperform state laws.
False information about immigration federalism is: "Arizona's decision against the United States overturned all of Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration."
