1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reil [10]
3 years ago
14

I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST + 80 POINTS!!!

History
2 answers:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<em>Jackson was quick to clarify that this did not imply that he would approve of projects which were of "national" character. Even though there is not a constitutional argument to be made against this type of action, it would be unwise to do so at the time, given the public debt. Until the debt was paid off, there would be no surplus to spend on these projects.</em>

<em />

<em>Generally, Jackson supported internal improvements. During his first term, he sanctioned federal expenditures for transportation projects at a rate nearly double that of the expenditures under President John Quincy Adams.[7] It was seen as good policy to spend federal money on national improvements, as long as two conditions were met. First, they should be done pursuant to a general system of improvement, not by ad hoc legislation. Second, the Constitution should be amended to make clear the limits on federal power.[8]</em>

<em />

<em>Some scholars[who?] argue that Jackson's veto can be seen as largely driven by personal, rather than political motives, particularly given Jackson's approval of internal improvement bills with as much a local nature as the Maysville Road. Jackson's veto may have been one of the many manifestations of the rivalry between Jackson and Henry Clay, who was one of the major proponents of the Maysville Road as part of his American System. </em>

source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maysville_Road_veto

~batmans wife dun dun dun....

diamong [38]3 years ago
5 0
Maysville road: Jackson vetoed the bill on the grounds that federal funding of intrastate projects of this nature was unconstitutional. He declared that such bills violated the principle that the federal government should not be involved in local economic affairs. Jackson also pointed out that funding for these kinds of projects interfered with paying off the national debt.
National Bank veto: <span>As his term continued, Jackson truly grew a desire to crush the Second Bank of the United States. Over time he had decided that it could not continue as it was, and that it did not warrant reform. It must be destroyed. Jackson's reason for this conclusion was an amalgamation of his past financial problems, his views on states' rights, and his Tennessee roots. </span>
You might be interested in
In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because of what?
Scilla [17]
I think you forgot to give the choices along with the question. I am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because <span>)the officer did not have time to secure a warrant. I hope that the answer has come to your desired help.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a similarity between the Abbasid and Umayyad islamic empires?​
bixtya [17]

Answer: The Umayyad dynasty undertook its administration work from Damascus while Abbasid did so from Baghdad. The fact that both caliphates managed their administration duties from their capital cities creates a common similarity between them two. Both Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates were made up of Sunni affiliated Muslims

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
¿que entienden Aristoteles y kant por felicidad?
Annette [7]

Answer:

Aristóteles escribió que elegimos la felicidad siempre por sí misma, y ​​nunca por el bien de otra cosa. Él creía que la felicidad era el fin, y es autosuficiente.

Según Immanuel Kant, el mapa de ruta hacia la felicidad no es tan blanco y negro. Kant pensó que los medios para la felicidad no podían conocerse claramente. Kant creía que había demasiada ambigüedad en la definición de la felicidad personal, lo que la hacía inadecuada como base para la moralidad.

Explanation:

Aristóteles escribió que elegimos la felicidad siempre por sí misma, y ​​nunca por el bien de otra cosa. Él creía que la felicidad era el fin, y es autosuficiente. Es el fin al que apuntan las acciones virtuosas. Debe ser algún bien o conjunto de bienes que en sí mismo haga que valga la pena vivirlo. Aristóteles cree que dos características deben estar presentes en la noción de felicidad. Una es que debe ser un fin más que un medio. Por ejemplo, descubro que al ser alegre gano dinero, así que hago dinero teniendo una disposición alegre. El segundo es que la felicidad es autosuficiente en sí misma. Debe buscarse solo para sí mismo, y no por el bien de cualquier otra cosa. Aristóteles menciona específicamente la vida de gratificación (placer, comodidad, etc.), la vida de hacer dinero, la vida de acción política y la vida filosófica, es decir, la vida de contemplación o estudio.

Según Immanuel Kant, el mapa de ruta hacia la felicidad no es tan blanco y negro. Kant pensó que los medios para la felicidad no podían conocerse claramente. Kant creía que había demasiada ambigüedad en la definición de la felicidad personal, lo que la hacía inadecuada como base para la moralidad. Kant sostiene que la búsqueda de la propia felicidad o interés de una persona no tiene ningún valor moral. Kant insiste en que nunca podremos determinar si una acción es buena o correcta considerando sus efectos en la felicidad de uno. Pensaba que un humano es incapaz de razonar la felicidad según su principio. La felicidad es indefinida, y aunque todos desean felicidad, él / ella nunca puede conocer realmente sus verdaderos deseos y voluntades. En lugar de buscar la felicidad, descubrió que la ley moral construida por la razón es lo que una persona debería estar buscando.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the themes in Giotto’s work?
Levart [38]

Answer:

D none of the above mentioned

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What where some differences between North and the south during the civil war?
Valentin [98]
The differences of the north and south civil war lays on the social and economic affairs. The south wanted new states to be labeled “slave states” while the north wanted the new states to run into “free states”
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which document states that it is the right of the citizens to overthrow their government if it no longer represents the common g
    7·1 answer
  • Question 1. Who has the power to begin the impeachment process against a U.S. official?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the long term effect of the “Bleeding Kansas” problem
    8·2 answers
  • Why do we know so little about the Indus Valley Civilization? What evidence do we have that the Indus Valley people were an adva
    5·1 answer
  • 37. There shall be one War Chief for each Nation and their duties shall be to carry messages for
    10·1 answer
  • The "Iliad" and the "Odyssey" are important because they __________. A. tell the true history of the Trojan War B. are great wor
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a long-term health effect of the atomic bombings on Japan?
    7·2 answers
  • What Was The First thing ever invented
    11·2 answers
  • What battle was the turning point of the war in pacific
    5·1 answer
  • What was the main argument of public school reform activists in the early nineteenth century?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!