1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Trava [24]
3 years ago
6

Both the Mauryan and Gupta Empires were located in

History
2 answers:
crimeas [40]3 years ago
8 0

They were both located in India. Mauryan was 321 to 180 BCE and Gupta was 320-550 CE. Religions were both Hinduism, but in mauryan empire ashoka brings in Buddhism, religious toleration. Mauryan had rock and pillar edicts and Gupta had the golden age where great things were happening. They both had trade and Gupta traded silk, cotton, and elephants. Mauryan had social stratification and Gupta had a powerful military. Both had a patriarchal society.

I hope this helped!!

maw [93]3 years ago
5 0
Eastern India in the Mauryan dynasty
<span />
You might be interested in
The main goal of the policy of containment was to
Eddi Din [679]

Answer:

The answer is "The Marshall Plan pursued containment through the use of the spread if Communism in Europe"

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. Why do you think Hungary was given this elevated status<br> while other ethnic groups were not?
ANEK [815]

Answer:

yqowsfdeeycbwixbwud

Explanation:

hsuamfhanianrtyanis yw gssyw

8 0
3 years ago
6. The cotton gin led to an increase in
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

it actually decreased slavery by a little

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened in Afghanistan after the collapse of the Soviet Union
Fofino [41]

Answer:

After the withdrawal of Soviet troops 25 years ago, Afghanistan plunged into a civil war causing further destruction. ... The invasion had left behind a devastated country, with more than one million Afghans being killed and around 5.5 million displaced.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
2. What is the effect of the ""cancel culture"" actions on History? Is it socially responsible to remove unfavorable or sensitiv
Anna35 [415]
Cancel culture hasn't taken a huge effect on history other than "canceling" figures such as Christopher Columbus. Multiple monuments have been toppled or graffitied on that represent the dark spots in history, such as confederate leaders, colonizers, etc. Though the context in history books have not changed as much. Removing history from the books is no the responsibility of cancel culture. Cancel culture could be a possible threat to learning true history and how we came to be. We must learn true history to not make the same mistakes we did in the past. History will repeat itself.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was george washingtom choosen to lead the continental army​
    7·1 answer
  • During the Spanish-American War, the United States fought in a naval battle in the Philippines. How many sailors did the U.S. lo
    11·2 answers
  • 1. Explain the events of Bacon’s Rebellion and why it was important?
    11·1 answer
  • What and where is Brandenburg?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a concept of democracy
    8·2 answers
  • The highest in the world, the mountains are located in northeast India and were created when the subcontinent of India pushed in
    5·1 answer
  • What was the downside to being the pope in medieval times?
    15·1 answer
  • Which was not an issue during the 2004 U.S. presidential election?
    10·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
    7·2 answers
  • Match each business model with the type of business that commonly uses it.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!