All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Bank<span> provides funds for business as well as personal needs of the individuals. they play a significant role in the </span>economy<span> of a nation</span>
King believes that through staging mass action movements, he and his followers were making it clear not only to the U.S. but to world that racism and inequality exists. Through drawing the country’s attention to civil rights, it could spur government into action to protect African American’s rights to treated as equals.
Augustus because it is said that after he died no one could top him and he made so many new things
A.
He thought it was unconstitutional for the government to make an uncharted purchase or something similar to that.
