Article one of the U.S Constitution aims to establish everything regarding the legislative power of the nation and particularly, regulating the organisms and the functions that are given and are a part of this legislative power. First, it establishes that the control of the legislative power falls on the U.S Congress and also the state legislatures. It also establishes that the Congress will be divided into two houses, the House of Representatives and the Senate and sets the functions and powers given to each house. It establishes how the representatives to each of the houses will be selected and the periods of power they will have. It also establishes the division of power between the three main branches of government: executive, legislative and judicial.
In this particular excerpt, the article is refering specifically to the constitution of the legislative power, who will be able to be a member of this branch of government and the functions and limitations as well as the reaches that this branch will have.
i would say atleast either B,C or D
The Russian empress Catherine<span> II (1729-1796), known as </span>Catherine the Great<span>, reigned from 1762 to 1796. She expanded the Russian Empire, improved administration, and vigorously pursued the policy of Westernization. Her reputation as an "enlightened despot," however, is not wholly supported by her deeds.
From encyclopedia.com </span>
They thought slavery was terrible and they didn't want to take sides with Southern Virginia, where slavery was the main part of the economy and the society. They thought it was immoral, selfish, and cruel. They didn't want to be a part of the movement that supported slavery. (during the civil war)
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
Answer:
The correct approach will be Option c (moral organizations
).
Explanation:
- An individual must have been in a situation between either two or even more alternatives of movement to have been a moral agent throughout any circumstance.
- For instance, if an individual started suffering a stroke while driving but instead got into an accident, even though she could not have appointed to never have a stroke, she also isn't increasingly considered fully accountable again for the crash.
Some other options granted are not linked to the scenario in question. So, the solution is the above right one.
