1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
3 years ago
14

What did the British and French mandates in the Middle East have in common?

History
2 answers:
storchak [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Both mandates, do not respect the ethnic and historical differences of the people who lived in that territory and formalized borders that were not recognized by the inhabitants

Explanation:

  • The French Mandate of Syria (called the French Mandate of Syria and Lebanon until 1922), was a mandate of the League of Nations on the northern part of Syria and on Lebanon, the two territories were previously part of the Ottoman Empire. The mandate was created after the First World War and through the partition of the Ottoman Empire, determined by the victorious powers, being the most benefited France and the United Kingdom. During the two years that followed the end of the war in 1918 and according to the terms agreed in the Sykes-Picot Agreement signed by the British and French, it was the British who controlled the vast majority of Ottoman Mesopotamia (now Iraq) and part from Ottoman Syria (Palestine and Transjordan), while the French controlled the rest of Syria, Lebanon, Alexandreta and other parts of southeastern Turkey. In the early part of the 1920s, the League of Nations formalized the control imposed by the British and the French over these territories by a system of mandates and the Mandate of the League of Nations of Syria was assigned to France on September 29. 1923, which included the territories that today constitute the current states of Syria and Lebanon. The administration of the region under French control was carried through several governments and different territories, including the Federation of Syria (1922-24), the State of Syria (1924-30) and the Republic of Syria (1930-1958) , as well as the smaller states of Greater Lebanon, the Territory of the Alawites and the State of Yébel Druz. The French mandate of Syria lasted until 1943, when two countries emerged, the current Syria and Lebanon and also the Hatay Province, which had joined Turkey in 1939. French troops withdrew from Syria in 1946.
  • The British Mandate of Palestine was a territorial administration entrusted by the League of Nations to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the Middle East, following the First World War and as part of the partition of the Ottoman Empire, with the status of low territory mandate. The territory on which it was established corresponded to the southern region of the Mediterranean Levante, a region that the Ottoman Empire lost as a result of its defeat in the war. Although the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland administered these territories de facto from 1917, the Mandate entered into force in June of 1922 and expired in May of 1948. At first it included the present territories of Jordan, Israel and the present Palestine , although from September of 1922 the United Kingdom separated the Eastern part of the same, creating the Emirate of Transjordania.
sweet [91]3 years ago
5 0
They ignored the realities of the region when they set their artificial boundaries and they did not have a consistent governance model
You might be interested in
Please help me i took a picture of the question i need answer please helpp asap thank you if you see this read what i need help
Setler79 [48]

i think its the third question thats right.

8 0
3 years ago
What did the spoils system refer to?
Leya [2.2K]

The spoils system referred to:

  • <u>B. the appointment of friends and political supporters to government positions</u>

The spoils system refers to a system where political appointments are made  as a favor or payback to the friends and supporters of a politician when he is appointed in public office.

As a result of this, the people who are appointed may not always be qualified for a particular position, so it is not based on meritocracy, but rather as a favor to them.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B

Read more here:

brainly.com/question/14025144

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the issue of slavery in the territories so important to the north and south?
larisa86 [58]
Only north was more racist and south was more respectable with all the mixed races for all over the world cholos gangs china people and white people
8 0
3 years ago
Rousseau believed in all of the following, EXCEPT
soldi70 [24.7K]
Rousseau believed in all of the following things except for the abolition of the church.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How could people grow crops in a semiarid landscape?
vichka [17]

Answer:

certain crops can grow in dry but yet moist landscapes such as a semiarid or dry rainforest, certain plants can only grow in certain areas,

and dryland farming techniques for the non-irrigated cultivation of crops is a common practice, epically places that can experience a drought, but what you'll do is, space all the crops from each other, have very strict weed control, this means you can use certain products and cant have them growing around for too long

Explanation:

the type of crops you can grow will be sugar beets, grownfruits, alot of veggies

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which does not describe a change that took place between 1800 and 1821 to the boundaries of the United States?
    8·1 answer
  • What two Mediterranean societies are being compared? During what approximate time period
    9·1 answer
  • Why did President Nixon order the secret bombing of the hochi Minh trail in Cambodia
    12·2 answers
  • Who were the bolsheviks?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a central idea from the Age of Enlightenment?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the allies react to woodrow wilson’s peace plan??
    9·1 answer
  • Was advocating for socialism during the war equivalent to falsely shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre? explain.
    5·1 answer
  • How would you define progress ? (based of imperialism &amp; industrial revolution) ??help
    15·1 answer
  • Can you write what you analys and evaluate of honor crimes happening in other parts of the world?
    7·1 answer
  • How was religion important during the founding and growth of the 13 colonies ?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!