1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
3 years ago
14

What did the British and French mandates in the Middle East have in common?

History
2 answers:
storchak [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Both mandates, do not respect the ethnic and historical differences of the people who lived in that territory and formalized borders that were not recognized by the inhabitants

Explanation:

  • The French Mandate of Syria (called the French Mandate of Syria and Lebanon until 1922), was a mandate of the League of Nations on the northern part of Syria and on Lebanon, the two territories were previously part of the Ottoman Empire. The mandate was created after the First World War and through the partition of the Ottoman Empire, determined by the victorious powers, being the most benefited France and the United Kingdom. During the two years that followed the end of the war in 1918 and according to the terms agreed in the Sykes-Picot Agreement signed by the British and French, it was the British who controlled the vast majority of Ottoman Mesopotamia (now Iraq) and part from Ottoman Syria (Palestine and Transjordan), while the French controlled the rest of Syria, Lebanon, Alexandreta and other parts of southeastern Turkey. In the early part of the 1920s, the League of Nations formalized the control imposed by the British and the French over these territories by a system of mandates and the Mandate of the League of Nations of Syria was assigned to France on September 29. 1923, which included the territories that today constitute the current states of Syria and Lebanon. The administration of the region under French control was carried through several governments and different territories, including the Federation of Syria (1922-24), the State of Syria (1924-30) and the Republic of Syria (1930-1958) , as well as the smaller states of Greater Lebanon, the Territory of the Alawites and the State of Yébel Druz. The French mandate of Syria lasted until 1943, when two countries emerged, the current Syria and Lebanon and also the Hatay Province, which had joined Turkey in 1939. French troops withdrew from Syria in 1946.
  • The British Mandate of Palestine was a territorial administration entrusted by the League of Nations to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the Middle East, following the First World War and as part of the partition of the Ottoman Empire, with the status of low territory mandate. The territory on which it was established corresponded to the southern region of the Mediterranean Levante, a region that the Ottoman Empire lost as a result of its defeat in the war. Although the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland administered these territories de facto from 1917, the Mandate entered into force in June of 1922 and expired in May of 1948. At first it included the present territories of Jordan, Israel and the present Palestine , although from September of 1922 the United Kingdom separated the Eastern part of the same, creating the Emirate of Transjordania.
sweet [91]3 years ago
5 0
They ignored the realities of the region when they set their artificial boundaries and they did not have a consistent governance model
You might be interested in
Does the preamble to the Declaration of Independence indicate reasons why the new independent government might be similarly remo
insens350 [35]

Answer:yes

Explanation:Bc it says it

4 0
3 years ago
What is the problems of democracy and citizenship vs. slavery,woman, and Indians
aliya0001 [1]

Answer: French 18th-century and 19th-century constitutions as well US constitution (18th century) are believed that constitute the basis and fundament of today´s modern democracies but in their original version they were made for white man. So one can say that "we Americans" is a hypocritical statement because excluded many people. The same can be said about the French constitution (1st French republic) that contradicts its preamble (the test speaks of "les droits universells de l´homme et du citoyen").

Explanation: what was said above perfectly demonstrates that 18th-century intellectual revolution was a revolution of white European man from which many were excluded (indians, women, poor).

7 0
3 years ago
How old was alexander hamilton when he wrote the federalist papers?
jenyasd209 [6]
21 years old that is the answer
4 0
3 years ago
How do maps shape the world we see? <br> (I need a paragraph for this answer)
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

they show us the location of the parts of the world

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The House of Burgesses represented the first step toward self-government in the Americas. Which action represented the second?
laila [671]
C ) is the right answer
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a cause of the dust bowl in the 1930s
    11·2 answers
  • What were the causes of the Mexican-American War? What was the course of the conflict and the results?
    7·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank: Christopher Columbus was looking for a route to _____________
    12·1 answer
  • What is the difference between the Vietcong and the Vietminh?
    14·2 answers
  • During the war, a flu pandemic killed 20 million people, twice a many as
    11·1 answer
  • When you said we must have self-respect, I wondered how we could have self-respect and remain patient considering the treatment
    14·2 answers
  • What were the results of the baker v carr
    6·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of the idea "federalism?"
    9·2 answers
  • Henry Knox served under George
    11·2 answers
  • I need help with questions in my history class
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!