Hi, the answer to your question is: D. November.
HOPE THIS HELPED! D:
Angle B is also 54° because they are vertically opposite angles.
Now, you do 54+54=108 and then 360-108=252. (The angles should always add up to 360, so remember that) Because angles C and D are also vertically corresponding angles, they add up to 252, and each measure 126°
Basically, what this asks you is to maximize the are A=ab where a and b are the sides of the recatangular area (b is the long side opposite to the river, a is the short side that also is the common fence of both corrals). Your maximization is constrained by the length of the fence, so you have to maximize subject to 3a+b=450 (drawing a sketch helps - again, b is the longer side opposite to the river, a are the three smaller parts restricting the corrals)
3a+b = 450
b = 450 - 3a
so the maximization max(ab) becomes
max(a(450-3a)=max(450a-3a^2)
Since this is in one variable, we can just take the derivative and set it equal to zero:
450-6a=0
6a=450
a=75
Plugging back into b=450-3a yields
b=450-3*75
b=450-225
b=215
Hope that helps!
No it can’t unless. Both 3 and 2 are prime. Please mark Brainliest to help meh rank up!!!