Throughout his novel, “The Great Gatsby,” Scott Ella Edward Edward Fitzgerald examines the melodic theme of materialism and wealthiness to develop the clear idea that even though money can have a lot of value and make the great unwashed big businessman full, it is not a leading constituent towards happiness.
Wealth is the nitty-gritty of economic success and social acceptance throughout the report. All lineaments, both men and women, are eager to fill their lives with wealth to compass their ultimate end of satisfaction in a guild. However, as Fitzgerald demonstrates us in his Scripture, craving for money and power and achieving genuine and loving relationships in life story are equally futile.
The golden hat, representing power and wealth, is what gives people their condition and what attracts women the most. Such was the case with Daisy, whose hungriness for wealth made her marry Tom Buchanan rather than her true and authentic love: Gatsby.
Fitzgerald clearly depicts how materialism can corrupt even the most inexperienced person, making the characters live distorted and immoral lives due to their hunger for money. The solicitation of money is the basis of all trouble the characters confrontation.
Have an excellent 2019! :)
Answer:
Killing should never really be considered to be justified whether in a work of fiction or not; however, Rainsford was in a position of kill or be killed. The whole thing is a case of kill or be killed, essentially self defense. I guess it depends on how you view that type of thing, but in my opinion, if Rainsford had not killed Zaroff, then he would have undoubtedly died. Therefore, yes I believe he was justified in his decision.
As with all interpretive questions, your answer is based upon your own reading of the story and how you analyze the plot and characters. Rainsford had escaped Zaroff, and won the game. There was no reason to return to the masion and kill Zaroff except to exact revenge. Consider that Rainsford himself is a hunter, used to being in power. Although he had never considered doing something as inhumane as Zaroff in hunting humans, his choice to kill Zaroff reveals his need to be in control. In this case, his killing of Zaroff isn't about justice, but about revenge.
On the other hand, there is nothing to suggest Zaroff would have quit hunting humans. He was a static character, who didn't change even when he "lost" the hunt of Rainsford. In this reading, the audience can interpret that Rainsford is doing his part for mankind by eliminating the threat of the murderer Zaroff. After all, on this island, there is no justice system by which to prosecute him.
You will need to choose the answer that best supports your understanding of the characters.
The correct method of documenting a source using MLA format is "This technology was first introduced back in the seventies (Hamilton 83)," option B.
<h3>How to document a source in MLA style?</h3>
First, we must pay attention to whether or not the citation already contains the name of the author. If it does, there is no need to place the name in parentheses. Thus, we can eliminate options A and C.
Second, we must see if the page number is mentioned in parentheses. It should be placed after the author's name, without a comma separating them. Thus, we can eliminate option D.
With the information above in mind, we can choose option B as the correct answer, "This technology was first introduced back in the seventies (Hamilton 83)."
Learn more about MLA style here:
brainly.com/question/2960216
#SPJ1
C because i just took the test and got it right
