We need to make sure we know what each of these words mean before we can decide which answer is best.
Satire is the use of humor, comedy, or exaggeration to criticize people's vices.
Irony is expressing your meaning by using language that is the opposite of what you mean, usually for humorous effect.
Dialect is a particular form of language that is specific to a region or group.
Hyperbole is extreme exaggeration.
With these definitions in mind, we can knock hyperbole off immediately as there is nothing exaggerated about the words we're looking at. Satire doesn't quite fit either because it's not obvious or apparent what is being satirized here. Irony also isn't a good choice because what is ironic isn't immediately obvious. Dialect is your best choice because the last part--"a-comin"--implies someone has dropped the g at the end of coming and makes it sound like a dialect.
The answer is c important evidence used to defend against enemies
Social media posts are both. Sometimes social media posts are good and bad. it’s pretty complicated but here and there it’s bad and sometimes it’s good! it depends on who’s posting :)
Answer:
The disadvantages of acquiescing as described by Martin Luther King is stated below in the explanation section
Explanation:
According to Martin Luther king, the disadvantages of acquiescing are as follows:
- The oppressed resign themselves to their faith. they considerately adjust themselves to oppression, and therefore becomes a part of it. in every movement for freedom some of the people oppressed chooses to remain in oppression.
- sometimes people deal with oppression is to resort to corroding hatred and physical violence.Violence often such causes momentary results. nations have often won their independence through battle, but in spite of these short victories, violence never brings peace. It does not solve social problem; it merely produce more and new complicated ones.
- People's search for freedom is the way of a resistance of nonviolence. just like the synthesis in Hegelian philosophy, the principle of nonviolent resistance seeks to restore back the truths of two opposites-acquiescence and nonviolent resister approves with the person who acquiesces that one should not be aggressive physically against his opponent; but he balances the equation by supporting with the person of violence that evil must be stopped.
