1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
10

Can someone help me answer this pls!! I give 100 points ¿THREE paragraph essay summarizing the battle between the Native America

ns and the U.S. Government?
History
1 answer:
Nuetrik [128]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Change happened fast in the late 1800's. While "progress" was great for some, it also spelled the end of hundred of years of Native American tradition. It was hard to believe that the American West and East were part of the same country. The West was primarily an area of homestead farmers, miners, and cattle ranchers. While Easterners tried to make their way farther and farther west with the growth of industry and railways, Native Americans desperately clung to the hopes of maintaining their territory and tribal traditions.

Conflict between whites settlers and Native Americans had been around since the earliest settlements. Now that industry was expanding so rapidly, the fight for land brought a whole new face to these disagreements. The need for land, as well as the feeling of superiority to the Native Americans were the driving forces behind most of the policies derived in the 1870's and 1880's. The transcontinental railroad became the catalyst for much of the new conflict. Before its completion, the only Americans to venture westward had done so on horseback or covered wagon. Now thousands more could move across the much more quickly and a much less cost. In addition, what settlers also wanted the land to farm. Native Americans were increasingly pushed off their lands and forced onto reservations. The Indian Removal Act also contributed to this. At the beginning of the 1830s, Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida.

This was land that their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations. After this act came into effect, very few natives remained anywhere in the southeastern United States. They were pushed out West. Working on behalf of white settlers who wanted to grow cotton on the Indians' land, the federal government forced them to walk thousands of miles to a designated "Indian territory" across the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

make a conclusion I at least tried

You might be interested in
Interpret Why do you think that party loyalties were so evenly divided after the end of the Civil War?
chubhunter [2.5K]

They were all afraid of irritating people (who vote). Since people (who vote) decided their unavoidable future, they didn't want to take any strong stances on anything and just went with the flow and played the tune that the people wanted to hear. They needed to stay in power and not lose it for taking a serious stance.........

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was NOT true of the transcontinental railroad?
Harrizon [31]

the correct answer for this is A

8 0
3 years ago
What would you predict the author’s perspective will be on the Stamp Act?
kaheart [24]
We need further information to find the answer like a page or something
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the antebellum (pre-civil war) temperance movement, this group was key in fighting for it. question 15 options: children
Bess [88]

The answer is slave. The Antebellum Era, likewise roughly denoted to as the Plantation era, was an era in the past of the Southern United States, from the late 18th period up until the beginning of the American Civil War in 1861, manifested by the economic development of the South grounded on slave-driven plantation agribusiness. The revivalism that spread thru the country throughout the antebellum era also contributed increase to several social reform movements like abolitionism (sought to end slavery).

8 0
3 years ago
How did the courts get the power of judicial review
KIM [24]
<span>The Supreme Court's landmark decision regarding judicial review is Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803). Marbury was the first Supreme Courtdecision to strike down an act of Congress as unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the opinion for a unanimous Court.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the reason For Liberty Bonds poster world war I
    11·2 answers
  • write a letter to the king of france as a peasant explaining the hardships you are facing, what your grievances are, and what th
    14·1 answer
  • How might the rights guaranteed in Amendment I be stated as a basic constitutional principle? What basic principle does it prote
    5·1 answer
  • __________ was a Dutch scholar who criticized the church.
    12·2 answers
  • What would life be like today<br> if cities did not exist?
    10·1 answer
  • Which powerful empire dominated the fertile crescent for over 1000 years
    8·1 answer
  • What justification does Senator Beveridge make for the American control of the Philippines?
    9·2 answers
  • Explain how changes in the constitution affected: a) the king
    9·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between the Roman religion and Christianity?
    6·1 answer
  • Help please !! I’m stuck and I don’t know these answers
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!