1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
10

Can someone help me answer this pls!! I give 100 points ¿THREE paragraph essay summarizing the battle between the Native America

ns and the U.S. Government?
History
1 answer:
Nuetrik [128]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Change happened fast in the late 1800's. While "progress" was great for some, it also spelled the end of hundred of years of Native American tradition. It was hard to believe that the American West and East were part of the same country. The West was primarily an area of homestead farmers, miners, and cattle ranchers. While Easterners tried to make their way farther and farther west with the growth of industry and railways, Native Americans desperately clung to the hopes of maintaining their territory and tribal traditions.

Conflict between whites settlers and Native Americans had been around since the earliest settlements. Now that industry was expanding so rapidly, the fight for land brought a whole new face to these disagreements. The need for land, as well as the feeling of superiority to the Native Americans were the driving forces behind most of the policies derived in the 1870's and 1880's. The transcontinental railroad became the catalyst for much of the new conflict. Before its completion, the only Americans to venture westward had done so on horseback or covered wagon. Now thousands more could move across the much more quickly and a much less cost. In addition, what settlers also wanted the land to farm. Native Americans were increasingly pushed off their lands and forced onto reservations. The Indian Removal Act also contributed to this. At the beginning of the 1830s, Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida.

This was land that their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations. After this act came into effect, very few natives remained anywhere in the southeastern United States. They were pushed out West. Working on behalf of white settlers who wanted to grow cotton on the Indians' land, the federal government forced them to walk thousands of miles to a designated "Indian territory" across the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

make a conclusion I at least tried

You might be interested in
What was the main point of Franklin Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech?
beks73 [17]
The answer is D. I hope this helps you.
8 0
3 years ago
In what year was India granted independent by Great Britain?<br><br> A.1947<br> B.1915<br> C.1999
RideAnS [48]
On June 15, 1947, the British House of Commons passed the Indian Independence Act, or Mountbatten Plan, which divided India into two dominions, India and Pakistan. It called for each dominion to be granted its independence by Aug. 15 of that year.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP I NEED REVIEWING MY ANSWERS. 1.)who were the central figures during the middle ages?
oee [108]
1) Central figures in medieval art were mostly religious motifs or emperors which were presented as if they were saints. Commonly, paintings or frescoes in buildings would show great kings building monasteries or helping people or similar things.

2) Religious motifs were mostly depicted in art at the time. Pictures were often of Jesus Christ and his sacrifices or of him helping people or other saints. In that period, art had to be bigger than people and had to serve a function for people and present religious beliefs.

3) Nowadays art is more complex. At that time art didn't presume that self-reflection would be involved while understanding art nowadays has a huge degree of analysis and self-reflection on what has been seen. Also, nowadays art isn't about religion or kings but rather about abstract concepts.
8 0
3 years ago
The area in red was the site of conflict between
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

The communist and non communist forces

Explanation

Non communist offered opposition to communism that started in 1917 as a Revolution in Russia and spread to reach world dimensions during the Cold War. The non communism holds different political positions including the liberal, socialists and democrats. The Russian White movement is still remembered as the first organization that dedicated itself towards opposition of communism

3 0
3 years ago
Which development would best serve as a turning point between two<br> historical periods?
balu736 [363]
A Civil War best serve as a turning point between two historical periods.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!
    15·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the plague on feudalism
    11·1 answer
  • What was a key for the post war cash crunch in america
    5·1 answer
  • Which idea is associated with Horace Bushnell? A. religious liberalism B. religious fundamentalism C. religious intolerance D. r
    15·1 answer
  • What is providence and according to beveridge what does providence have to do with America and Philippines? When providence is c
    13·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE: The Romans associated the Thyestian feasts and Oedipean practices myths with the Christians due to misreading the
    7·1 answer
  • The troubled asset relief program (tarp) worked to
    8·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Clean Air Act of 1970?
    15·1 answer
  • What laws were passed in the Southern states to control enslaved people?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how being able to analyze an author's purpose can be a useful skill for history students
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!