The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Confirmation is a holy sacrament, it is performed or received after you have been baptized When you are baptized, you receive the Holy Ghost and the sacrament of Confirmation validates, or confirms the strenght received by the baptism. There must be a preparation course (spiritual) to receive the Confirmation, it must be received in a state of "grace" (after a confession) and it must be performed by a Bishop. The Roman Catholics receive the Confirmation between the ages of 12 and 17.
It is a compound complex sentence
O. Henry's The Gift of the Magi is considered a short story. O. Henry is actually a pen name for William Sydney Porter. The short short story is about a married couple and their ways of dealing with the challenges of purchasing Christmas gifts for each other. The challenge is, it has to be a secret and they don't have much money.
The answer is: <span>He appreciates Della's gift to him, even if he won't be able to use it.</span>
The argument does not show how peppermint oil should be used, which could lead to public rejection of this product.
We can come to this answer because:
- Coffee is a product well known by the public, who already know its effects and how to use it.
- To show a product that can completely replace the coffee of the article readers' lifetime, the author should present a product that is equivalent to coffee.
- Although the author presents peppermint oil as an alternative product to coffee, the author does not explain the usage formats and the effect of this oil.
- This promotes incorrect reasoning, as the reader will not be able to see the equivalence between the two products.
In this case, the author did not make a good comparison between the two products, as it reinforces the practicality of consuming coffee and makes peppermint oil inaccessible.
It should be remembered that the above question does not show all answer options and the options presented are incorrect.
More information:
brainly.com/question/4117438?referrer=searchResults
