An article from millercenter.org shows <span>key factors that contributed most to Bill Clinton reelection:
</span>
Midway through his first term in office, Clinton's reelection prospects were dim, given the stunning victory of Republicans in the 1994 off-year elections. For the first time in forty years, both houses of Congress were controlled by Republican lawmakers. And almost everyone blamed Clinton. His campaign promise to reform the nation's health care system was soundly defeated. His controversial executive order lifting the ban against homosexuals in the military enraged conservatives and failed to generate significant public support. Clinton's work on behalf of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) split the Democrats, many of whom feared the loss of jobs to Mexico and Canada.
Additionally, a barrage <span>of political and personal scandals plagued the Clinton administration in its first term. The most damaging issue surrounded charges that the Clintons had illegally profited from their involvement with a failed savings and loan that had dealings in Arkansas real estate on the Whitewater River. Charges swirled fast and furious, specifically linking the White House to a cover-up of the Whitewater affair and the suicide of Vincent Foster, a top White House aide and close friend of Hillary Clinton. Moreover, the administration was negatively affected by allegations of suspicious commodity dealings by the First Lady (she had turned a $1,000 investment in commodities into a $100,000 profit), and the rumored sexual escapades of President Clinton while governor of Arkansas (including allegations that he had sexually harassed an Arkansas state employee, Paula Corbin Jones).</span>
Due to Safavid influence, present-day Iran is the only country that has SHIA MUSLIM STATE GOVERNMENT.
Their high regard to physicians have not diminished since the Safavid Dynasty. Instead, the status of physicians are higher than ever and the medicinal works used during Safavid Dynasty are still being used in present-day Iran.
It has been accepted that Congress may, in proposing an amendment, set a reasonable time limit for its ratification. ... This it held to be a political question that Congress would have to resolve in the event three-fourths of the states ever gave their assent to the proposal.
Because the laws that applied to the proclamation
<span>Webster stated that it should “interpose between their citizens and arbitrary power.”</span>
