The increased use of expensive medical technology is the most important factor leading to rising health care costs in the united states since 1980.
<h3>Why is medical technology so expensive?</h3>
- Due to the high expenditures of clinical trials, research and development, and market variables, medical equipment is quite expensive. A cutting-edge medical technology nearly typically costs more money.
- America's healthcare system has grown more complex. Each insurer has their own specifications. Because of this, hospitals must produce a wide range of documentation according to the patient's insurance company. They are unable to reduce expenses and standardise the procedure.
- The money needed to establish the infrastructure for a private medical college is the cause of the high fees.
- If you are unable to obtain a seat at the government medical college of India, it may be assumed that becoming a doctor in India might be quite expensive.
Learn more about expensive medical technology refer to :
brainly.com/question/20692581
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is Double-declining-balance. The highest net income in year 2 is 6000.
This higher net income don´t mean the machine was used more efficiently under this depreciation method.
Explanation:
In the file attached you will find a depreciation schedule for each of the alternative methods.
Each method need different calculus.
Straight-line
depreciation expense=(Original Value -Residual Value)/Useful life=
depreciation expense=4400
Units-of-production
estimated productive life 10000
Units of Production Rate=(Original Value -Residual Value)/estimated productive life=2,2
Double-declining-balance.
Depreciation rate = 1/useful life *100= 20,00%
Answer:
The monthly withdrawals are $3,537.85 and will last for 23 years.
Explanation:
We have to calculate the monthly installment of an annuity:
PV 568,900.00
time 276 (23 years x 12 months)
rate 0.004333333 (5.2% = 5.2 / 100 = 0.052 per year we now divide by the 12 months of a year and get the rate for monthly withdrawals.
C $ 3,537.85
A company in monopolistic opposition produces an allocatively green output degree even as a company in best opposition produces a productively green output degree.
The long-run equilibrium answer in monopolistic opposition usually produces 0 monetary income at a factor to the left of the minimal of the common overall value curve. The life of excessive limitations to access prevents corporations from coming into the marketplace even withinside the long run.
Therefore, it's far viable for the monopolist to keep away from opposition and hold making tremendous monetary income withinside the long run. One feature of a monopolist is that it's far a income maximizer. Since there's no opposition in a monopolistic marketplace, a monopolist can manage the charge and the amount demanded. The degree of output that maximizes a monopoly's income is calculated through equating its marginal value to its marginal revenue.
Learn more about company in monopolistic here:
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ4
Answer:
This distribution is not taxable since Raoul is not earning any money at all (dividend income = $0), but the tax basis on the stocks that he holds will vary.
Before the distribution, Raoul had 310 shares, each share with a $60 tax basis. After the distribution, Raoul will have 465 shares, each share with a $40 tax basis.