Answer: Structured compensation program
Explanation: In a structured compensation program the company structures the pay of employees on the basis of a predetermined criteria. The abilities needed to get promotion in such structure could be fixed on the basis of time period served or any other such criteria.
In the given case, Jamie gets promotion at every stage by passing a certain test. Thus, we can conclude that the company is performing structured program.
Answer: Only one issue is discussed at a time
Members have equal and basic rights (vote, oppose and heard)
Minority rights are protected
Explanation:
The parliamentary meeting procedure is as follows;
- Only one issue is discussed at a time
- Members have equal and basic rights (vote, oppose and heard)
- Minority rights are protected
- The chairman authorizes anyone to speak
- The chairperson is impartial.
- Votes decides decisions
- Every member on the floor can contribute
The purpose;
They are rules to ensure businesses are operated in the right order
Answer:
The profit margin earned if each unit requires two machine-hours is 25%
Explanation:
For computing the profit margin, first, we have to compute the estimated overhead rate per unit which is shown below:
Estimated Overhead rate = (Estimated manufacturing overhead costs) ÷ (estimated machine hours)
= ($240,000) ÷ (40,000 machine hours)
= $6
Now the profit per margin would equal to
= Selling price per unit - direct cost per unit - overhead cost per unit × number of required machine hours
= $20 - $3 - $6 × 2
= $5
Now the profit margin would equal to
= (Profit per unit) ÷ (selling price per unit) × 00
= ($5 ÷ $20) × 100
= 25%
Answer:
D
Explanation:
its is D because why not ight
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
