Answer:
Budgeted cost of goods sold = $3,150,000
Explanation:
Given:
Budgeted beginning finished goods inventory = $390,000
Budgeted production costs = $3,000,000
Budgeted ending finished goods inventory = $240,000
Find:
Budgeted cost of goods sold
Computation:
Budgeted cost of goods sold = budgeted beginning finished goods inventory + budgeted production costs - budgeted ending finished goods inventory
Budgeted cost of goods sold = $390,000 + $3,000,000 - $240,000
Budgeted cost of goods sold = $3,150,000
Answer:
5 hours would work! Hope it helps!
Explanation:
100 off top!
40 in labor for each hour
40 times 5 is 200
so that would cost 300
for xyz
65 off top and 50 in labor for each hour
5 times 50 is 250
250 plus 65 is 315 !
We, consumers, favor products or services that perform well or prefer the "<u>performance attributes</u>" of what we want to consume. This feature is most, if not all, customers prefer.
The dimension of the utility function for the customer is the performance attributes of a product, good or service. Performance quality, attributes and characteristics distinguish the goods or services from those of rival brands or businesses, which the buyer may find to be very important.
If we ask a firm what their product or service is to be given and we can relate to its features or performance characteristics, the strategic activities correspond to the performance attributes subcomponent of the market utility function.
Find out what appeal is a creative strategy that elaborates on product or service attributes or benefits: brainly.com/question/28348246
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. both firms will reduce their price.
Explanation:
The Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem that lies inside the game theory where the player could attain the expected result by not deviating to the beginning strategy. In this, the strategy of the each player is optimal at the time when the other player decisions are relevant
So as per the given situation, both the firm should decrease their price
hence the option b is correct
Answer:
Lowa should produce corn; Nebraska should produce Wheat
Explanation:
Two states: Iowa and Nebraska
Same two goods are produced by both of them: Corn and wheat
For lowa,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = 3 bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of wheat
For Nebraska,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = 3 bushels of wheat
According to the concept of comparative advantage, a country is exporting the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage and a country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity is lower than the other country.
In our case, lowa should producing and exporting corn because the opportunity cost of producing corn is lower than the Nebraska and on the other hand, Nebraska should producing and exporting wheat because the opportunity cost of producing wheat is lower than the lowa.
