1. X,Y (6,-10)
2. X,Y (1,-4)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, the irrational number stays irrational.
Make the assumption that this statement is false and that a rational and an irrational can produce a rational. x is irrational. Assume that a, b, c, and d are all integers. If you like, they can be relatively prime to each other.
a/b + x = c/d Subtract a/b from both sides.
x = c/d - a/b Now put the 2 fractions over a common denominator.
x = (c*b - d*a)/(b*d) Investigate what you have.
b*d are two integers multiplied together. multiplication of integers is closed (the answer will be an integer).
cb and da are also integers. subtracted integers are also closed under subtraction.
But
Here's the kicker. An irrational number is one that cannot be expressed as a fraction. Sqrt(2) for example cannot be shown to be rational. There is no fraction that equals sqrt(2)
So our proof is "bogus." It cannot work. An irrational number excludes the possibility of being able to be represented by a fraction by definition.
Answer:
You should first make sure you explain what exactly is the question, before delete others answers.♀️♀️
Step-by-step explanation:
You can find the answer by multiplying the length by the width by the height, then rounding your quotient to the nearest whole number. Or you can round the length, width, and height (5 x 5 x 3) and your answer would be your quotient. The answer would be either 70 or 75. There are a variety of ways to answer this question.