Answer:
Functionalist perspective
Explanation:
The functionalist perspective is a phenomenon that has been understood that is a complex system that parts work together for the stability and solidarity of workers. In this approach, the sociologist looks at a micro-level. Functionalism is an approach that takes the society at whole perspective. Herbert spencer popularized society as part of society's organs that work for the body functions. From the social perspective, functionalism has prerequisite needs such as water, shelter food clothing, and money, etc. are very important for a person to live life from above the poverty line.
God, if I could choose, I would say none. All of these lead to inequality (because circumstances vary between many individuals) but I believe prestige should hold the most weight in determining social class. Prestige (which is respect, recognition, or regard) is based on many criteria, including wealth, family background, fame, leadership, power, occupation, and accomplishments. Leadership, power, and accomplishments can both be achieved by any individual with hard work. This is still an unfair balance (gender inequality, racial/ethnical inequality/racism) because of individual factors, it still leaves hope for some people to rise the social ladder.
Your answer would be the "Dutch" hope this helps you :)
The answer is during a Trial
